About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 10:10amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Greetings.

In order to see the New Renaissance Hat, please go to http://www.geocities.com/rational_argumentator/newrenaissancehat.html.

I shall try to render it available for viewing on SOLO shortly.

Symbols are concise representations of the principles one advocates; to proliferate effectively, their message needs to be explicit, and they need to be open to replication by men with less than the best artistic abilities. Thus far in its existence, the Objectivist movement has had a dearth of symbols to represent its principles. Only two exist: the Atlas and the Dollar Sign. Both are excellent in the message they promote; one emfasizes the colossal importance of productivity in human relations, the other is a representation of the capitalist ideal. Yet both have their shortcomings as well; Atlas is a bit too complicated to draw for one not well versed in art or the human form. The Dollar Sign is employed by other agencies, most notably the U.S. Government, and is often used by non-Objectivists as a utilitarian symbol devoid of the ideological significance Objectivists attach to it. While keeping the above two symbols, a new one is needed that will explicitly denote the principles of objectivity, reason, egoism, and capitalism, as well as the impact that those principles would have if infused into the general culture. It also needs to be easily drawn by the layman but at the same time not replicate stereotypical symbols of our age (i.e. animals, stars, colored stripes, torches, harps, wings, light bulbs, etc.).

I have invented a symbol that would fulfill all the above criteria. It is dubbed the “New Renaissance Hat,” a top hat with a shield of half-gold, half-white in the foreground. The top hat is representative of rationality, civilization, culture, prosperity, sofistication, and esthetic taste—ideals that Objectivists and their allies hold in their aspirations. What is needed to protect these ideals? The shield answers this question. The bottom half of the shield is white, the color of purity, innocence, and consistency, symbolizing a commitment to principles and an unquestionable honesty and integrity in their pursuit. The top half is gold, the color of… gold! Gold is the legitimate form of money, a representation of one of the highest values held by a rational man and his commitment to the production of values. Gold is also the color of capitalism, the free economic system necessary to bring monetary prosperity about. In addition, it is the color of light, and its symbolic corollaries, enlightenment, insight, intellectual lucidity, and brilliance. The shield represents all of the values and methods that, when exercised, preserve the culture and civilization of Reason that Objectivists desire.

 

The “New Renaissance Hat” is intended to capture in its composition a coming cultural revival and may thus be adopted by all those who share a commitment to the principles for which it stands. It shall become the new logo of The Rational Argumentator, but its proliferation into further realms can be foreseen. Products can be marketed commercially with the New Renaissance Hat on them; pins, badges, book covers, artworks, clothing, and, yes, even hats, can in some manner incorporate this new symbol.

 

I am

G. Stolyarov II

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0


Post 1

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 5:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Why is it that oddballs always distinguish themselves by their hats?


Post 2

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 12:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Why is it that oddballs always distinguish themselves by their hats?

That is a good, rhetorical question.  The fact remains that the answers highlight some interesting facts about people qua people.

Hats make you taller, i.e., more important. 

To see your hat, people literally have to look up to you.

Hats make you taller, i.e., apparently less vulnerable to attack.

Hats surround your head with an "aura" giving you a "halo" of divinity.

Hats are vestiges from covering yourself in the skin of an animal to take on its powers.

Hats are vestiges from covering yourself to "cloak" your identity.  Being unable to identify you leaves people less capable of defense against you -- and makes you less vulnerable to retaliation later.

Hats protect the head from attack, of course.

Hats protect the brain from the elements.

If I am not mistaken, John Kennedy was the last president to wear a top hat to his inauguration.


Post 3

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 2:04pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ah. Now I know.

Post 4

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 5:59pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I.N.,

Hey, I'm wearing a Cubs hat! Does that make me an oddball?

Wait a minute....I keep rooting for the Cubs..........


Nevermind, don't answer that!!!


gw


Post 5

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 6:07pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
As far I a'm concerned, all guys who like sports are oddballs-- or have odd balls  --  thinking, ''mathematically'' and not only in appearance.

[I don't mean that - you probaly have two, quite normal ones. It just seemed in the spirit of this discussion.]


Post 6

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 9:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I.N.,

Actually, one reminds me of Uncle Fester and the other is very close to looking like Bruce Willis.

But that's just me.....looking at my balls.....Ummmm...............Never mind!


gw


Post 7

Friday, September 2, 2005 - 11:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dayaamm!

So that's what that thing was I have seen in Stoly's posts all the time.

I never could figure it out. It always looked like a coffee cup on a saucer or something to me...

Michael


Post 8

Saturday, September 3, 2005 - 6:17amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Now I'm questioning my principle. Comparing MEM's post and pic---no hat!

Post 9

Saturday, September 3, 2005 - 9:34pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm kind of surprised this didn't result this didn't warrant more ruthless ridicule when the guy was here to experience it.

---Landon


Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Post 10

Sunday, September 4, 2005 - 10:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Its Phunny, we discussed this phine filosofer phairly recently.  He may be an intelligent kid, but he is just another nut job and certainly not an Objectivist in my book.  His hat "logo" makes me hack up hairballs...and that is my professional opinion as a graphic designer.

Kat



Post 11

Sunday, September 4, 2005 - 1:44pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Landon writes:
>I'm kind of surprised this didn't warrant more ruthless ridicule when the guy was here to experience it.

Hi Landon,

You're suprised? Ditto. But trust me, crazy as it sounds now, he had a major fan base round here for a while - he was genuinely taken seriously. Eventually people cottoned on, as they always do with these types - but man, it took long enough. Personally, I always found "ruthless ridicule" about the only sensible response to The Golden Hat etc.

- Daniel



Post 12

Sunday, September 4, 2005 - 5:33pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Yeah, I think I was lurking back when he was posting.  Seems totally crazy this guy ever passed for normal or sane.

Also Kat, thanks for confirming my sensibilies.

---Landon


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.