About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Friday, September 28, 2012 - 4:07amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
ON ANTITRUST COOPERATION
BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
AND THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
AND THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)
AND THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA


The United States Federal Trade Commission and the United States Department of Justice, on the one hand, and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (Government oflndia) and the Competition Commission oflndia, on the other hand (collectively referred to as the "U.S. and Indian competition authorities"),
Desiring to enhance the effective enforcement of their competition laws by creating a framework that provides for enforcement cooperation between the U.S. and Indian competition authorities,
Recognizing the benefit of technical cooperation between the U.S. and Indian competition authorities in order to enhance an environment in which the sound and effective enforcement of competition law and policy supports the efficient operation of markets and economic welfare of the citizens of their respective nations, ...

Full text here. Four pages, not very exciting.
But I like how they call themselves "competition enforcement." 


Post 21

Friday, September 28, 2012 - 1:36pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Pretty much a disgusting collusion of governments on setting up training on how best to pick corporate bones clean.

I wonder if we have any memorandum like this with the European nations that aided and abetted in the Antitrust rapes of Microsoft?

On the other hand, we should be doing some form of partnering with other governments in the protection of property rights.

Post 22

Wednesday, January 9, 2013 - 11:53amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Penguin settles with Government in Apple Anti-Trust Case
 
United States v. Apple, Inc., Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Verlagsgruppe Georg Von Holtzbrinck GmbH, Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan, The Penguin Group, A Division of Pearson PLC, Penguin Group (USA), Inc., and Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Publisher Defendants feared that Amazon would resist any unilateral attempt to force an increase in e-book prices and that, even if an individual Publisher Defendant succeeded in such an attempt, that Publisher Defendant would lose sales to any competitors that had not forced the price of their books to supracompetitive levels. (Compl. ¶¶ 35-36, 46.) They met privately to discuss ways to collectively solve “the $9.99 problem.” (Compl. ¶¶ 39-45.) Ultimately, Publisher Defendants agreed to act collectively to raise retail e-book prices.
http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/applebooks.html

December 18, 2012:
Penguin agrees that it will cooperate in the United States' ongoing prosecution of this case, including substantially complying with the United States' requests for production, responding reasonably to requests to authenticate Penguin documents, making Penguin employees identified by the United States on December 7, 2012 as likely deponents available for deposition in the United States upon notice by the United States, and reasonably accommodating requests by the United States to make Penguin employees, wherever located, available for testimony at trial as needed.
http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f291000/291031.pdf



Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.