Fact: Jennifer Iannolo generally posts on matters more related to sense of life issues than on technical philosophic onesIt seems I have misread the masthead. I could have sworn this was a "Sense of Life" site. I find it interesting that you have paid so much attention to what I am and am not posting, Mr. Bisno, as I don't believe I've addressed you once on this site.
As I expend my mental energies elsewhere in building companies and formulating development strategies for them, I often have little interest in discussing philosophical minutae. I prefer to live the philosophy, not debate it incessantly.
Fact: Jennifer Iannolo also flirts with many of the male soloists.Of course I do.
Fact: Jennifer Iannolo finds self denigrating misogynistic humor which implies that women are of limited rational faculty funny. And, in a related joke, implies that women who do have one are generally unloved.It wasn't self-denigrating, Mr. Bisno. It was denigrating towards irrational women.
Most of the women I have encountered *are* of limited rational faculty, whether they be business executives, secretaries or waitresses. And, truth be told, most men prefer them that way. If you have found a corner of the planet where this is not largely true, please enlighten us.
Inference: It sounds a lot like she believes that women should shy away from intellectual issues and focus instead on getting a mate. That is a fairly weak inference, and entirely incorrect. However, as I neither seek nor desire your approval to live my life, in the end what you think really doesn't matter.