About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Thursday, October 28, 2004 - 3:42pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Michelle, you wrote: "I recall that Peikoff admitted to the affair as early as 1986, when the Passion biography came out. He said he had been looking through Rand's papers since her death in 1982, and found some journal notes indicating that there was an affair between her and Nathaniel Branden."

No, I believe that Peikoff's discovery that there was an affair was later than 1986. When "The Passion of Ayn Rand" was published, Peikoff and Schwartz angrily denounced me for all kinds of evil for daring to say that there could possibly have been an affair between Rand and Nathaniel.

Peikoff finally admitted that there had been an affair when he was asked a question about it at the Ford Hall Forum. He said that his then-wife had been going through some of Rand's papers, and had found entries making it clear there had been an affair lasting many years.

Strange, Peikoff's letter of apology to me must have been lost in the mail; I never received it.

Barbara



Post 21

Thursday, October 28, 2004 - 7:10pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
The more I hear about this Peikoff fellow, the less I like him.



Post 22

Friday, October 29, 2004 - 5:34amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Barbara,

I was in the audience at the Ford Hall Forum when Peikoff admitted that Cynthia looked through Rand's papers and found her journal notes about the affair. The year was 1987, not 1986 as I thought, but still earlier than 1997, when the SOL movie came out, which was what Marcus thought.



Post 23

Saturday, October 30, 2004 - 4:53amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Peikoff's letter of apology to me must have been lost in the mail; I never received it.
In my opinion, Branden's portrayal of you in "Judgment Day" is a far greater offense.





Post 24

Saturday, October 30, 2004 - 7:31amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Michelle: "In my opinion, Branden's portrayal of you in 'Judgment Day' is a far greater offense."

It's not news that I considered it wildly inaccurate, which I made loudly and publicly clear. He did, however, present a somewhat more reasonable picture in "My Years with Ayn Rand."

I thank you for objecting to the portrayal in "Judgment Day."

Barbara



Post 25

Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - 8:39amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

I watched the movie again over Christmas.

 

Actually Nathaniel Branden is mentioned even more than I remembered.

 

Peikoff is highly complimentary of him, saying that he was very intelligent and articulate and would charm anybody.

 

He didn't portray him as a heretic or evildoer at all.

 

Of course Barbara is definitely not mentioned. However, I believe she is in fact indirectly mentioned when Peikoff talks about how many of "us" were introduced to Ayn through friends and relatives.

 

From memory, did not Barbara introduce her cousin Leonard Peikoff to Ayn Rand? 

 

It's a bit weird that he doesn't seem to want to talk about Barbara directly though.

 

I still thought that it was a very well-made documentary and does portray her sense of life, even with all it’s omissions.




Post 26

Monday, March 13, 2006 - 2:24pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I was looking to purchase "Ayn Rand: A sense of life," and was wondering what is the difference between the original and the director's cut version?



Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.