About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Saturday, July 28, 2007 - 8:58pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Remember: if these savages hadn't by accident been sitting on great pools of oil, their women would be sex slaves in harems and the men would be wallowing in their camel dung litter box of a country, sucking sand and babbling incoherently to desert jinns, allah and other non-existent magic forces that frighten them rather than flying on planes that they could never have invented nor understood.

Screw the spoiled desert rats!


Post 1

Saturday, July 28, 2007 - 11:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
That's great! Can you imagine being asked to move from your airplane seat because you are a male stranger? Apparently even Europeans can't tolerate that much Islamic garbage. What a foul religion.

Post 2

Sunday, July 29, 2007 - 5:45amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Think of all the strange men they were forced to deal with in the boutiques of Milan!  And the waiters bringing their tea.

Hypocrites.


Post 3

Sunday, July 29, 2007 - 8:25amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Remember: if these savages hadn't by accident been sitting on great pools of oil, their women would be sex slaves in harems and the men would be wallowing in their camel dung litter box of a country, sucking sand and babbling incoherently to desert jinns, allah and other non-existent magic forces that frighten them rather than flying on planes that they could never have invented nor understood.

Can't say it much better than that, Ed!

Still, Robert Heilein says "Anything worth doing is worth overdoing." So let me try: [brace yourselves]

In the name of truly sacred Western liberalism, that "king" should have been roughly, summarily thrown off the "flying camel" (as he puts it) and then beaten within an inch of his life -- to teach him some manners. The "princesses," in turn, should have been forced to orally service every male on the flight. Any failure to satisfy should have resulted in a similar beating -- to teach them the real meaning of personal dignity and feminine modesty (i.e. that which you religious witches invariably lack). ;-)

Western Civilization rules!


Post 4

Sunday, July 29, 2007 - 10:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Andre, now really!

A simple trip to the county jail until they paid the fine or posted bail for disorderly conduct and criminal trespass would have been sufficient. Oh, and I do hope the passengers sue.

Would you have wanted these women to do to you what you propose? I wouldn't want them to touch me.

Ted Keer

Post 5

Monday, July 30, 2007 - 3:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
     I really have little prob with their attitude about 'sitting next to a male stranger.' The prob is: WHY did they a) SIT there before complaining about their seats or even b) wait until they got on a 'public' transport, knowing the risk therein?

     Besides, couldn't they afford their own jet? This WAS a 'royal' family, no?

LLAP
J:D

PS: I have nothing against harems.   :)


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 6

Sunday, August 12, 2007 - 9:48pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Speaking of Kyrel "Sand N!ggers" Zantonavitch

I had refrained from commenting on the continued presence of Grand Nagus Zantonavitch on this list and his continued racist and (if one can even so dignify it) sexist remarks. I politely suggested to him above that perhaps the forcible rape of the Arab women would be improper and even distasteful to those who would presumably be the lynching rapists. (Has he been studying the Taliban?) On other matters, he and I had mostly agreed, and had apparently had a cordial relationship. When he made his sand n!gger remark, I refrained from criticizing him in public and sent him a private email on the subject which he can print if he thinks I was inappropriate. But after my post above, he sent me this email:

"Please don't reply to any of my RoR comments. I find you unbearably rude and wierd. [sic] I also think you're essentially vermin. If you have to pollute RoR with your noxious presence, please don't answer or take notice of anything said by me, as I prefer to have nothing to do with you."

Now, I suspect there are many other posters on this list who find me weird and certainly a few who find me rude. But I was shocked by Kyrel, a.k.a. Andre's email of July 30, since we had even discussed meeting for lunch. I asked him two weeks ago in private to explain his remarks and invited him to return to civility. But, since he continues to post here and has refused to explain himself, let me point out his bizarrely ignorant overt racism, his revolting calls for forcible rape, and the fact that he is a most disgusting example of what the name of Objectivism does not need. "Polluting noxious vermin?" Indeed, from him, such remarks are high praise.

Ted Keer

(Edited by Ted Keer on 8/13, 4:06am)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.