About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Monday, December 20, 2010 - 10:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This is dreadful, and this is just the beginning. Say goodbye to free speech on the internet. This is just one more thing that the government wants to get it's hands on and regulate, and eventually it will unless there is a huge backlash or the Supreme Court steps in to stop it.


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Monday, December 20, 2010 - 11:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The good news is that it won't come before congress until after the new congress is seated.

This was the worst quote from the article: "Internet-freedom advocates have called the rules a step in the right direction but say they don't go far enough."

Many of the progressives are cunning. They'll say anything and pass anything that they can get passed, just to establish the precedent of regulating the Internet.

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 - 2:02pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Imagine if they'd have applied this principle earlier:

FED EXP would have been prohibited from charging a premium for guaranteed go fast delivery using the 'same' public interstate system and airways as the USPS.

The 'net' effect would have been, no FED EXP option today. Or UPS for that matter. Just the same USPS level of service for everybody.

aka, once again, the failed Soviet model. These people are in a totalitarian rut.



Post 3

Wednesday, December 22, 2010 - 6:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

FB:  Imagine if they'd have applied this principle earlier:  FED EXP would have been prohibited ...  and airways ... 


They did apply that model earlier, but interstate regulation of ground and air transportation was effectly dismantled by the Reagan Administration as soon as they came in in 1980.  It was one factor in America's economic recovery. When they speak of the deregulation in the Reagan Revolution, that was most of it.  Previously, the situation was right out of Atlas ShruggedCarriers filed tariffs for rates to haul freight over specific routes.  Anyone could challenge the tariff and the ICC would decide.  The ICC could investigate on its own, of course.  So, if you make huarache sandals in Albuquerque and you have a market in Boston, and I have a truck, I can carry your footwear from A to B -- but no stopping in Cincinnati along the way.  And if Ed Thompson makes "Jamaican Beach Sandals" and has Wolf carrying them from Albuquerque to Boston, then Ed can sue Wolf for the low rate I give you, or you can sue Wolf forcing him to carry yours or Ed can file a complaint against you for an unfair rate or I can do that to Wolf.  We lived like that for 100 years under the Interstate Commerce Act.  And as the Interstate Commerce Clause is still understood now as then, it could apply to anything... and does... Just that the ICC was demobilized under President Reagan.

You are old enough to remember REA Express.  Before World War I, there were freight forwarders.  They gathered small lots all over town, hired a railroad car, packed it for the railroad, and the train took it to some city where another freight company unloaded it and delivered it.  Before interstate highways, this was highly effective and profitable for everyone.   When the USA entered World War I, the federal government nationalized the railroads -- and the freight forwarders.  (They also seized all radio receivers and transmitters.)  After the war, they gave the railroads back. but kept all the freight forwarders under one company, the Railway Express Agency.  Agency, as in government agency.  It was nominally "private" but under ICC regulations, there was no competition.  It was a hassle for UPS in the early days, but UPS finally won in the marketplace.  Constant bankruptcies and reorganizations finally killed REA in the mid-1970s. 

Telecommunication (radio and television) is still regulated along these lines. 

The reason you have a cell phone now and for a few years you had an answering machine is because of the Modified Final Judgment of Judge Bell that broke up the legal Bell monopoly.  They had "car phones" and answering machines and fax and data lines -- but no one could afford to use them.  You must remember 300 baud modems and Xmodem protocol.  Hackers invented them to utilize the voice grade lines because "data grade" was a business rate service.  Businesses paid more for service so that consumers could pay less, in return for which, of course, Bell enjoyed a monopoly.

I'm just saying, these unificators did not invent anything: they're just trying to implement a known model, and, yes, it is the Soviet agriculture model.


Post 4

Thursday, December 23, 2010 - 3:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

WD: Say goodbye to free speech on the internet.


Actually, free speech will be mandated.  It is freedom of speech -- and freedom from speech -- that are in danger.  By this rule, you will be able to get an account at AllChristians.Dot.Com and force them to carry your ScrewJesus.Dot.Com network off their lines.  ... which might be cool ... until the Earth Liberation Front discovers RoR (or, more correctly, RoR's ISP.)

It will greatly inhibit investment and innovation.  No one will be able to know in advance whether their infrastructure is for sale to their clients at their prices -- or to someone else at some other price.


Post 5

Friday, December 24, 2010 - 10:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I totally can't wait to hear the across-the-nation outrage from Americans over this.

Oh wait.....

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.