| | Great story, Brandon.
Later(tenth grade): "OK, sure I can be selfish, but I can't go around killing people can I? No, that doesn't make sense. Why? Then people can go taking all your stuff that you worked for.
Ok, then what limitations need to be placed on 'selfishness?' Hmm, how about rights? That makes sense, so a man can do whatever he wants as long as it doesn't violate another's rights allows selfishness but doesn't allow people to go around killing or stealing, ok good.
Now, obviously you are merely retracing the early steps you took (at a young age, even) in your journey toward Objectivism. So when I criticize something above, it's not really criticism of you -- instead, it's criticism of an idea. Everyone makes mistakes along the way. I, myself, couldn't let go of philosophically-immature ideas about abortion and atheism, not for a few months, anyway.
Okay, you mentioned how individual rights prevent selfish people from killing one another. But I'm not sure Rand would say the same thing. Instead, she might say that it isn't just any "kind" of selfishness, which is a virtue -- it is only the rational kind. And, further, being rational isn't just being rational in the short term (e.g., cunning criminals) and it isn't just being rational in a compartmentalized way (e.g., being religious except for in scientific matters). Instead, it's long-sighted, wide-minded thinking.
It turns out that when you think about it, when you really think about things and integrate them, it turns out that going around and killing people is not in your rational self-interest. This is logically prior to the issue of rights. In fact, the idea of what's in a human's rational self-interest is what it is that gives rise to the idea of individual rights.
Of course, you may know all of this now -- but posting the early steps you took merely gave me the opportunity to really shine the light on the matter.
Ed
(Edited by Ed Thompson on 1/25, 3:16am)
|
|