About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 20

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 5:48amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
To enter Mensa, I had to score in the top two percent on a standardized IQ test.  The local chapter conducted these sessions monthly and offered two tests with a break between them.  I scored 139 on one and 141 on the other, so I averaged them to 140 for the poll.

I had my fill of IQ tests as a measure of rationality when I attended a Mensa weekend regional gathering that featured, as part of the entertainment, a psychic palm-reading astrologer in the hospitality suite.  Her most memorable quote:

"Palm reading is an art while astrology is a science."

I agree with Bidinotto's critiques of standardized IQ tests.  Attend a Mensa event to judge the results for yourself.  Prepare for sophistry.

(Edited by Luke Setzer on 12/11, 7:48am)




Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 21

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 7:17amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
As far as I am concerned IQ tests are a waste of time. If you are actually intelligent, you would be doing intelligent things, you would not need a test. If you take a test, which says you are intelligent, but you don't do anything that requires intelligence, than you are a person who is indistinguishable from one who is not intelligent, just as a person who is able to read but never does is indistinguishable from an illiterate.

People wear high IQ scores as if they are some badge excusing them from actually doing anything which requires intelligence. Mensa gatherings consist of hardly anything more than people who don't do anything talking about how intelligent they think they are and patting each other on the back all the time.

Furthermore, the whole idea of trying to measure intelligence as a 'quotient' is absurd, since aptitude in intellectual endeavours exist on many different tangents. To accurately measure intelligence one would need to raise different people in identical environments and provide them with identical stimuli, and then test them with the exact same test.




(Edited by Michael F Dickey on 12/11, 7:18am)




Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 22

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 8:42amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I enjoy the process of solving the puzzles posed in intelligence tests and I get an endorphin rush when I get the insight that comes with it. They exercise your intellectual muscles, but I doubt that I would have anything in common with members of a high IQ society.




Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 23

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 1:46pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I use the IQ tests as a kind of diagnostic tool. I've always been "spiky" in various aptitude tests. As a kid I always scored near the bottom in visual\spatial tests. I ended up in chemical engineering where that skill wasn't quite so central to the discipline. However, as I've gotten older, through lots of practice, I perform much better at those skills.

I think it's good to have objective tests to learn your strengths and weaknesses so you can develop your own intellectual training plan accordingly.

Jim




Post 24

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 4:14pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I do enjoy tests. I always found it strange that people moaned when pop-quizzes were announced, while I secretly rejoiced. My PSAT score got me a full scholarship to Rutgers. Otherwise I'd have gone to Cornell and would still be paying off the student loan. Oops...

Ted



Post 25

Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 10:45amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Article in the LA Times today:

Drugs to build up that mental muscle

Over the last several years I've been taking beta blockers, together with a lot of other drugs for my congestive heart failure, and have noticed that I have recently become obsessed with IQ tests. (I initiated the poll) My experience certainly cannot be considered a controlled experiment but I believe that these drugs have had a beneficial effect on my mental processes. I'm expecting a scoring from the 9I6 test and can compare that to the Tickle test that I took before I was diagnosed with CHF. I'm currently taking the Sigma Society test.

Sam


 




Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.