About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 11:50amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"The code word for the new racism is 'diversity.' The Constitution of the United States says nothing about diversity and the Constitution is what a judge is supposed to pay attention to, not the prevailing buzzwords of the times."

"Much in the past of Sonia Sotomayor, and of the president who nominated her, suggests such resentments. Both have a history of connections with people who promoted resentments against American society. La Raza ("the race") was Judge Sotomayor's Jeremiah Wright. If context is important, then look at that context."

Those quotes are from part II of his analysis of Sonia Sotomayor. Part I is also worth a read. Part III was interesting, but not as strong.

I really like his attitude. He says that it would be insulting to the intelligence and integrity of Hispanic voters to lay off of Sotomayor in the hearing out of fear of harming the Republican's base-building efforts, or fear of appearing racist.

He doesn't buy into the idea that her Senate approval is a done deal and urges everyone to contact their senators and to raise a ruckus; "Nothing is inevitable in a democracy unless the public lets the political spinmasters and media talking heads lead them around by the nose." (from Part 1) And, that is quotable all on its own!

Go Thomas!

Post 1

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 12:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Of course you realize, Steve, Thomas Sowell is a religious conservative? Nonetheless, the article is well worth reading, and quoting, and I am disappointed Sowell didn't entitle part one "Part I" because had SW not referred to this piece I would not have gone looking for it.

Post 2

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 12:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ted,

Yes, he is a religious conservative, and because of that I read all of his remarks with a skeptical eye. But I usually find myself liking what he says.

Another economist/conservative columnist is Walter Williams (less Austrian and more Chicago School). Among the other conservatives I read, but agree with somewhat less often, are George Will, Charles Krauthammer, and Pat Buchanan (much less often), and Dick Morris (only for his analysis of sleazy political tactics).

On the Fox News channel, there is a Glen Beck show, and although I find his demeanor and style very off-putting, and his religious position is sad, he has the most Libertarian, even Objectivist guests.

I'm seeing more conservatives picking up Objectivist positions. Those who are primarily working to achieve religious positions, like anti-abortion or banning gay marriage continue to be more enemy that friend, but I see the trend towards addressing the issues with language that Objectivists agree with as a good thing. Obama and congress are so far to the left that it seems to have encouraged more advocacy of Capitalism instead of the usual conservative dithering about traditional values and moderation.

Are there columnists that you regularly read and would recommend... for their political writing, their economic insights, or their way with words?

Post 3

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 12:37pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mark Steyn
Ann Coulter
Christopher Hitchens
Charles Krauthammer
Ralph Peters
Victor Davis Hanson
Thomas Sowell
Camille Paglia

Post 4

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 2:45pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ted,

Thanks for the list. I love reading Coulter when she is goring the ox of my enemy - but only as entertainment. One day I read a rant of hers about the murder of the unborn and not being occupied with laughing at an attack on a common enemy, I saw the glaring flaws in her polemics.

Hitchens was a favorite of mine, even though we disagreed on so much, but when he went for Obama I stopped reading him - not out of pique, but just because we ceased to have enough in common. I'll have to check back in with that large, eloquent, but twisted intellect and see what he thinks after the first 100 days.

Peters is a man who has been there - I have his book on his adventures. I like his toughness, and directness.

Mark Steyn is new to me - I'll go take a look. (Just did... Excellent!)

Paglia is fun even if she doesn't grasp the proper set of principles in politics or economics. She is a burst of energy and a fresh perspective in other areas and is never concerned with PC.

I haven't read much from Victor Hanson. The sense I have is of an elegant writer of the old school, steeping in history, but too often an apologizer for the traditional - with sworn fealty to the RNC and Christianity. Is that on track?

Post 5

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 5:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ilana Mercer...

www.ilanamercer.com
(Edited by robert malcom on 6/06, 5:06pm)


Post 6

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 5:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
No, Hanson is primarily a classicist and a scholar. He is a lifelong Democrat. I have never heard him speak on religion. I caution you that the wikipedia article on him is misleading. He was not a strong supporter of Bush (indeed, he has been quite rationally critical of him) but has been an outspoken critic of mindless opposition to Bush's Iraq war policy. He speaks well for himself and needs no defenders.

Victor Davis Hanson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Victor Davis Hanson (born 1953 in Fowler, California) is a military historian, columnist, political essayist and former classics professor, notable as a scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a commentator on modern warfare and contemporary politics for National Review and other media outlets, and was a strong supporter of the policies of President George W. Bush. [misleading TK]

Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007[1] and the US$250,000 Bradley prize from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation in 2008.[2]

Hanson is also a farmer (growing raisin grapes on a family farm near Fresno, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism.
[edit] Early life, education and today

Hanson, who is of Swedish ancestry, grew up on a family farm at Selma, in the San Joaquin Valley of California. His mother was a lawyer and judge, his father an educator and college administrator. Along with his older brother Nils and fraternal twin Alfred, he attended public schools and graduated from Selma High School. Hanson received his B.A. from the University of California, Santa Cruz in 1975[citation needed] and his Ph.D. in classics from Stanford University in 1980. He is a Protestant Christian.[3]

Hanson is currently a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and Fellow in California Studies at the Claremont Institute. Until recently, he was professor at California State University, Fresno, where he began teaching in 1984, having created the classics program at that institution.

In 1991 Hanson was awarded an American Philological Association's Excellence in Teaching Award, which is awarded to undergraduate teachers of Greek and Latin. He has been a visiting professor of classics at Stanford University (1991–92), National Endowment for the Humanities fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California (1992–93), as well as holding the visiting Shifrin Chair of Military History at the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland (2002–03). He was a visiting professor at Hillsdale College in 2004, 2006, and 2007.[4]

Hanson writes two weekly columns, one for National Review and one syndicated by Tribune Media Services, and has been published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Commentary, American Heritage, City Journal, The American Spectator, Policy Review, the Claremont Review of Books, The New Criterion, and The Weekly Standard, among other publications. In 2006, he started blogging at Pajamas Media. In 2007, he was awarded the National Humanities Medal by President George W. Bush.

[edit] Politics

Hanson is a registered Democrat, but a conservative who voted for George W. Bush in the 2000 and 2004 elections.[5] He has been named a neoconservative by some commentators[6][7], and has stated that: "I came to support neocon approaches first in the wars against the Taliban and Saddam, largely because I saw little alternative."[8] Feeling that the current Democratic party does not have a morally responsible approach to foreign policy and no longer addresses the concerns of ordinary Americans, Hanson writes: "The Democratic Party reminds me of the Republicans circa 1965 or so – impotent, shrill, no ideas, conspiratorial, reactive, out-of-touch with most Americans, isolationist, and full of embarrassing spokesmen."[9]

Hanson has been a strong defender of President George W. Bush and his policies[10], especially the Iraq war[11]. He was also a vocal supporter of Bush's Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Hanson wrote of Rumsfeld that he was: "a rare sort of secretary of the caliber of George Marshall" and a "proud and honest-speaking visionary" whose "hard work and insight are bringing us ever closer to victory."[12]

[edit] Iraq War

Hanson believes that the Iraq War is a good and worthwhile undertaking and that it has been, on the whole, a laudable success. However, he stated in 2008 that he "disagreed with many of the decisions made about the Iraq war", such as the decision to disband Saddam's army.[8]

Hanson has pro-democratic and pro-Israel views on the Middle East. He believes that the annexation of land by Israel is not responsible for the turmoil in the Middle East. He believes that it is instead the lack of individual and political freedom in many Middle Eastern nations that has retarded economic, technological and cultural progress and is the root cause of radical Islamic terrorism.[13]

[edit] Confrontation with Iran

Hanson has argued that the US should take a much more confrontational stance towards Iran, advocating unilateral acts of war against Iran. On the Hugh Hewitt show in August 2007 Hanson stated: "We really need to start doing some things beyond talking, and if that is going into Iranian airspace, or buzzing Iranians, or even starting to forget where the border is and taking out some of these training camps, we need to do that and send a message, because they’re a paper tiger. They really are."[14]

[edit] Writings

Hanson cites the Theban general and statesman Epaminondas, Winston Churchill, and the American generals Sherman and Patton as his heroes. In the field of military history, Hanson cites John Keegan as being influential, and shares a mutual admiration with fellow classicist Donald Kagan and the historian Steven Ozment.

[edit] Carnage and Culture

Hanson is perhaps best known for his 2001 book Carnage and Culture, in which he argued that the military dominance of Western Civilization, beginning with the ancient Greeks, is the result of certain fundamental aspects of Western culture, such as consensual government and individualism. Hanson rejects racial explanations for this military preeminence, and disagrees as well with environmental or geographical explanations such as put forth by Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs and Steel.[15]

According to Hanson, Western values such as political freedom, capitalism, individualism, democracy, scientific inquiry, rationalism, and open debate form an especially lethal combination when applied to warfare. Non-Western societies can win the occasional victory when warring against a society with these Western values, writes Hanson, but the "Western way of war" will prevail in the long run. Hanson emphasizes that Western warfare is not necessarily more (or less) moral than war as practiced by other cultures; his argument is simply that the "Western way of war" is unequalled in its devastation and decisiveness.

Carnage and Culture examines nine battles throughout history, each of which is used to illustrate a particular aspect of Western culture that Hanson believes contributes to the dominance of Western warfare. The battles or campaigns recounted (with themes in parenthesis) are the Battle of Salamis (480 BC; free citizens), the Battle of Gaugamela (331 BC; the decisive battle of annihilation), the Battle of Cannae (216 BC; civic militarism), the Battle of Tours/Poitiers (732; infantry), the Battle of Tenochtitlan (1521; technology and reason), the Battle of Lepanto (1571; capitalism), the Battle of Rorke's Drift (1879; discipline), the Battle of Midway (1942; individualism), and the Tet Offensive (1968; dissent).

Though Carnage and Culture appeared before the September 11, 2001 attacks, its message that the "Western way of war" will ultimately prevail made the book a best-seller in the wake of those events. Immediately after 9/11, Carnage and Culture was re-issued with a new afterword by Hanson in which he explicitly stated that the United States would win the war on terror for the reasons stated in the book.

[edit] American education and classical studies

Hanson co-authored the book Who Killed Homer? with John Heath. This book explores the issue of how classical education has declined in America and what might be done to restore it to its former place. This is important, according to Hanson, because knowledge of the classical Greeks and Romans is necessary if we are to fully understand our own culture. Hanson blames the academic classicists themselves for the decline, accusing them of becoming so infected with political correctness and postmodern thinking, not to mention egoism and money-grubbing (grants, visiting professorships, conference-hopping, promotion based on unreadable publications), that they have lost sight of what he feels the classics truly represent.[citation needed]

[edit] Works

* Warfare and Agriculture in Classical Greece. University of California Press, 1983. ISBN 0-520-21025-5
* The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece. Alfred A. Knopf, 1989. ISBN 0-394-57188-6
* Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, editor, Routledge, 1991. ISBN 0-415-04148-1
* The Other Greeks: The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization, Free Press, 1995. ISBN 0-02-913751-9
* Fields Without Dreams: Defending the Agrarian Idea, Free Press, 1996. ISBN 0-684-82299-7
* Who Killed Homer?: The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom, with John Heath, Free Press, 1998. ISBN 0-684-84453-2
* The Soul of Battle: From Ancient Times to the Present Day, How Three Great Liberators Vanquished Tyranny, Free Press, 1999. ISBN 0-684-84502-4
* The Wars of the Ancient Greeks: And the Invention of Western Military Culture, Cassell, 1999. ISBN 0-304-35222-5
* The Land Was Everything: Letters from an American Farmer, Free Press, 2000. ISBN 0-684-84501-6
* Bonfire of the Humanities: Rescuing the Classics in an Impoverished Age, with John Heath and Bruce S. Thornton, ISI Books, 2001. ISBN 1-882926-54-4
* Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power, Doubleday, 2001. ISBN 0-385-50052-1

Published in the UK as Why the West Has Won: Carnage and Culture from Salamis to Vietnam, Faber, 2001. ISBN 0-571-20417-1

* An Autumn of War: What America Learned from September 11 and the War on Terrorism, Anchor Books, 2002. ISBN 1-4000-3113-3

A collection of essays, mostly from National Review, covering events occurring between September 11, 2001 and January 2002

* Mexifornia: A State of Becoming, Encounter Books, 2003. ISBN 1-893554-73-2
* Ripples of Battle: How Wars Fought Long Ago Still Determine How We Fight, How We Live, and How We Think, Doubleday, 2003. ISBN 0-385-50400-4
* Between War and Peace: Lessons from Afghanistan and Iraq, Random House, 2004. ISBN 0-8129-7273-2

A collection of essays, mostly from National Review, covering events occurring between January 2002 and July 2003

* A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War, Random House, 2005. ISBN 1-4000-6095-8



Post 7

Saturday, June 6, 2009 - 6:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ted,

I stand corrected on Victor Hanson. Thanks.

Post 8

Sunday, June 7, 2009 - 1:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

While I read all columns by the above, I also find

http://www.drudgereport.com/

keeps you abreast of developments.

And

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ is an opinion clearinghouse with an "illiberal" slant.

Post 9

Sunday, June 7, 2009 - 5:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I have RealPolitics on my favorites - in a folder called "Morning coffee" - bookmarked twice - once for the homepage, the second time for the list of columnists (you recommended it a year or so ago). I've added the drudge report. Thanks.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 10

Tuesday, June 9, 2009 - 9:59amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I am a big fan of Steyn because he is funny - witty perhaps is a better description.  Hearing the way he uses words to skewer people is just a beautiful thing.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.