| | A great challenge for minarchy is the transfer of political power. Conventional wisdom in the west says that popular elections are the way to do this, but this just results in majoritarianism. If "the people" will it, then it must be, or so it goes.
What is needed is elections that transfer a LACK of political power. The Constitution specifies a weak form of government, but allows a bare majority at the polls to impose their will on everyone else -- the minority who voted for the losing side, those who didn't vote despite being eligible to do so, and those who are ineligible to vote.
The result? This tiny minority has become emboldened to ignore larger and larger swathes of the Constitution, to the point where the effective rule for legislators is: "Do whatever you can muster 50% of the legislature to do and isn't overturned by the courts on Constitutional grounds -- and do your best to confirm judges who will not overturn even brazen violations of the Constitution.
A temporary solution (until a workaround is found by the statists for that, too) would be to dispense with majoritarian rule and replace it with a strong supermajoritarian rule for passing laws, and a superminoritarian rule for repealing laws.
It might take a revolution to accomplish that, since the looters who benefit from majoritarian rule are unlikely to voluntarily surrender their power over others. (Edited by Jim Henshaw on 5/08, 12:29pm)
|
|