About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Sunday, February 7, 2010 - 2:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Carly Fiorina and Pink Floyd



Post 1

Tuesday, February 9, 2010 - 11:40pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I only watched the first two minutes.  Did it have a point?  Who is Tom Brown to me that I should care?  Carlie Fiorina I know from her tenure at HP, and I understand that she is running for office in California, but I cannot vote there and would vote against her anyway, based on her track record.

There is a certain mentality that thinks (if that is the word) that you need to worry about things that you cannot control.  Myself, I live my life by my own standards as best I can, and it's enough to keep me occupied.  I understand that if everyone did that, the world would be a better place.  But they don't, so it's not. 


Post 2

Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 9:54amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This video is a parody of the original. You could, if you wish, compare the video to its original. The fact that it plays so well with the Pink Floyd substitute soundtrack is neat. And you have to wait to the end to see the FCINO-in-sheep's clothing.

Here is the original:



Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 11:36amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
There is a certain mentality that thinks (if that is the word) that you need to worry about things that you cannot control. Myself, I live my life by my own standards as best I can, and it's enough to keep me occupied. I understand that if everyone did that, the world would be a better place. But they don't, so it's not.
Nearly everything worth worrying about has something you can do... however small. No one of us will unseat Obama, but many of us will write about that change and hope for it. And sometimes we serve our self-interest with actions that we enjoy even if we haven't a chance of changing the minds of others.

As to the rest of Michael's statement, I'd just say it depends upon the standards.

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 4

Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 10:02amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Indeed, Steve.

Even something so comparatively fruitless as an Atlas sanction (or a private RoR mail) can be something which, in retrospect, is understood to be what it was that turned a person around from a life of never-ending despair ... to one of boundless joy.

Actually, I'm probably taking a little rhetorical liberty with those words, but my point remains. I have spoken with several folks on the brink of despair -- e.g., several folks contemplating suicide -- who, in retrospect, point back to a circumstance in which another individual served as a either friend or as an inspiring model and induced within them the contagious passion to grab life by its reigns and chart out their own course that much more efficiently.

Because there are always 2 things going on -- we are on the one hand (1) doing things, and on the other we are (2) witnessing ourselves doing things (and self-evaluating) -- it is important to think of what we do as not just an "efficient (material) cause"; as Mike apparently does -- but also as something deeper or more important than that. Rand talked about bridging -- and, therefore, abolishing -- the dichotomy between body and soul (or mind), between the material and the spiritual.

When you recognize folks as also spiritual beings -- it is assumed that everyone recognizes everyone else as a material being -- then life becomes more colorful and flourishing than it ever was before. In this respect, anything good that you do -- any value you act to gain or keep (at any level) -- can be seen in a positive light.

This is not to say that a spectrum of relative fruitfulness ought not be recognized, just that the notion of immediate and material results is not the correct standard for human moral action. That kind of thinking idolizes pragmatism at the expense of something more true.

Ed

(Edited by Ed Thompson on 2/13, 10:09am)


Post 5

Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 11:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
(Comparatively fruitless Atlas sanction given to Ed)

The inner and the outer - you can't separate one from the other. Cars don't go without fuel. A depressed person may be given the prescription to clean some small corner of their home. Depression is avoidance of the actions life wants, out of a sense of futility. The joys of success arise from experiencing one's sense efficacy in purposeful action.

If you are truly a rational egoist, you aren't focused on the outer world any further than it takes to maximize the inner world. That is, our purpose is long term happiness... we just use the outer world in that way that will bring us the greatest inner state. For example, Rand's expression of the virtue of productivity was in work that explored, and made concrete, and celebrated the heroic. She made her living, and LIVED, for the exaltation and joy of that particular inner state above many others. It was the prioritized value of that inner state that determined many of her decisions.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.