|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
 | Against Brainstorming Posted by Michael E. Marotta on 2/23, 6:14pm | |
| "... brainstorming groups think of far fewer ideas than the same number of people who work alone and later pool their ideas.” The link from Organizations and Markets (a sociology blog by professors friendly to Austrian economics) takes you to the original article in the New Yorker: Link here. The first empirical test of Osborn’s brainstorming technique was performed at Yale University, in 1958. Forty-eight male undergraduates were divided into twelve groups and given a series of creative puzzles. The groups were instructed to follow Osborn’s guidelines. As a control sample, the scientists gave the same puzzles to forty-eight students working by themselves. The results were a sobering refutation of Osborn. The solo students came up with roughly twice as many solutions as the brainstorming groups, and a panel of judges deemed their solutions more “feasible” and “effective." New Yorker link to Read more. Nemeth’s studies suggest that the ineffectiveness of brainstorming stems from the very thing that Osborn thought was most important. As Nemeth puts it, “While the instruction ‘Do not criticize’ is often cited as the important instruction in brainstorming, this appears to be a counterproductive strategy. Our findings show that debate and criticism do not inhibit ideas but, rather, stimulate them relative to every other condition.” Osborn thought that imagination is inhibited by the merest hint of criticism, but Nemeth’s work and a number of other studies have demonstrated that it can thrive on conflict. | ||
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
