|
|
|
Since all demands for equality are by definition meritorious regardless of merit, and since consequences are irrelevant, some interpreters say that inequalities anywhere should be fought against equally. But some inequalities are more egregious, say others, and thus more deserving of society's immediate concern. ... People, they say, know what they want, so no hierarchy of importance is required. [The moral man] starts anywhere, singling out for crusade the specific injustice about which he feels strongly; he is moved by emotionally charged concretes in the here and now. His eyes are not on a vision of an ideal human future, but on a perceptual-level flux of social sores--inequality of health insurance, of gender pay, of wheelchair access, et al--sores to be picked up piecemeal, fought against, and, if the emotional charge runs down, dropped piecemeal. Leonard Peikoff Book: The DIM Hypothesis. (2012). New American Library, p 175-6
Leonard Peikoff "Forced to be Free", Reason.com, via link at Peikoff.com
Leonard Peikoff Peikoff explaining Rand's version of "Goodbye" (i.e., "Good premises") in the Epilogue to VOR
Leonard Peikoff Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand
Leonard Peikoff Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand
|