About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Forward one pageLast Page


Post 80

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 5:24amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Linz wrote:
I'll confine myself to observing what a calamity it was when women were allowed out of the kitchen to vote.
I recall an article in Liberty magazine years ago that noted the dramatic increase in the size of government correlated with the granting of voting rights to women and blacks.  It implied that this new voting bloc, lacking experience in the world of economic and political liberty, turned from husbands and masters to government for the role of caretaker.  The inexperienced voting bloc used government to enforce questionable conclusions.  This argument has some merit though it oversimplifies the causes of government growth.  Nevertheless, it has relevance to the discussion at hand.

I see a minority of parents who managed to raise their children without corporal punishment inducing that all parents can raise all children that way.  Like the inexperienced voting bloc just described, they also turn to the government as the enforcer of a questionable conclusion.

The real calamity came when voting gave government powers it had no right to assume regardless of whether those votes came from women, blacks, men, whites, etc.  At the rate this thread has gone, perhaps children should have the right to vote!


Luke Setzer


Post 81

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 7:15amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Alec said,
Nowadays I'm hopeless to find someone who is willing to spank me...
Ah, when you find your love, Alec.


 


Post 82

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 9:32amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

It has just occurred to me that:

 

The pro-spanking side are arguing to protect the "rights of Parents to spank their children". Something that the anti-spankers don't want to refute.

 

Whereas the anti-spanking group are arguing for the "rights of children to not be spanked". Something that pro-spankers do refute and which is entirely consistent with their position.

 

The anti-spankers are being inconsistent. They can't have it both ways.

 

The anti-spankers need to sort this out in their own heads first, otherwise further debate is completely futile.

 
 


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 83

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 12:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Marcus,

You write, "The pro-spanking side are arguing to protect the "rights of Parents to spank their children". Something that the anti-spankers don't want to refute.... The anti-spankers are being inconsistent. They can't have it both ways."

It is in no way inconsistent to recognize that there may be rights that are not yet generally recognized as such, or that cannot be enforced in today's context without becoming a pretext for violation of other rights. Yes, I think that human children do have a right not to be subjected to actions that are deliberately designed to inflict pain on the child. And I think that I have a right not to be subjected to the consequences that predictably happen when a child subjected to such treatment, takes to practicing on his neighbors the lessons that he learned at home. But, given the governments that we have now, I think that immediate enforcement of these rights would be so destructive of our other rights that I don't want it to happen.

Ultimately, I expect that social recognition of individual rights will lead parents to adopt parenting methods that actually develop the human potential of their children's minds. Then we won't have the prospect of criminal sanctions for actions that today often result from mere incompetence. To anyone on this forum who thinks that spanking and so on can be "necessary," I'm announcing a standing offer of Ginott's "Between Parent and Child" when your child is born. If, having read it, you still actually find that you cannot bring up your child without smacking, swatting, slapping, spanking or beating him, I'll be ready to change my mind. But for now, both from having brought up 3 kids, and from having taught graduate courses in developmental psychology, I do not expect my position here to be disconfirmed.
(Edited by Adam Reed on 1/19, 12:19pm)


Post 84

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 12:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Joe: “And that is exactly why so many non-spanking parents have such horrible children.”

As a generalisation, this is nonsense, and I offer my own experience as a counter-example. Nobody I know makes a practice of smacking their children, and few of those kids would qualify as brats. Children are badly behaved because of poor discipline, not spanking practices.

“The child realizes they can't/won't do anything to him, and you're left with parents begging and pleading for good behavior.”

Again, poor discipline. I also question the implication that unless the parents can “do something to” a child, it will turn into a little shit. I think once you’ve reached the stage of having to do something to a kid, it’s probably too late, anyway.

There is an enormous confusion in this thread over the use of the term “force.” There are two major issues here: 1) keeping children safe; 2) punishing bad behaviour. In the first case, we can use restraining force, in the second, retaliatory force. The two uses are aimed at different types of behaviours.

The vast majority of parents use restraining force on their children at different times, the hot stove case being the obvious example. But slapping your child’s hand away from the stove, or forcefully restraining it in traffic, are not punishments, because those behaviors are not bad. They are normal childhood curiosity and thoughtlessness.

Hitting your sister, on the other hand, is bad, and should be punished. The parent can choose to return violence with violence, if they wish, or can choose other ways of dealing with the problem.

Brendan

(Edited by Brendan on 1/19, 12:25pm)


Post 85

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 12:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
In all fairness to Adam, I checked Amazon to learn more about the book he recommends.  It only had eight reviews but they all rated it most highly.  Usually terrible books get at least some terrible reviews.  So I added it to my "Wish List" for future reading.  I only "wish" an audio book version existed.

Adam, can you post a detailed review to the Books section of SOLO?


Luke Setzer

(Edited by Luther Setzer on 1/19, 12:55pm)


Post 86

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 1:28pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
About reviewing Ginott's book: Everything I could write for the rather general audience here is already in the reviews available on Amazon. I am busy writing other stuff - both here and for my day job, things that no one else is writing - so I shall beg off on this one.

Post 87

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 2:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Alec wrote: "Nowadays I'm hopeless to find someone who is willing to spank me (and who is not also Lindsay)."

Alec, you swore to me that there was no other spanker for you but me. You said my whippings were "simply the best"—they made your life complete. Now this ... this ... this abject betrayal & public infidelity.

I am undone. Forsaken & undone. My world has fallen apart. My life has turned to intractable woe.

Love-lorn Linz

(At this rate of whining I'll qualify as a smack-banner.)






Sanction: 15, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 15, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 15, No Sanction: 0
Post 88

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 2:08pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Amen, Pastor Reed! Galt bless you.
I think that human children do have a right not to be subjected to actions that are deliberately designed to inflict pain on the child. And I think that I have a right not to be subjected to the consequences that predictably happen when a child subjected to such treatment, takes to practicing on his neighbors the lessons that he learned at home. But, given the governments that we have now, I think that immediate enforcement of these rights would be so destructive of our other rights that I don't want it to happen.

I agree wholeheartedly.  I have also read Between Parent and Child and was influenced by it as well.  I don't think simple spanking should be illegal per se. Every family has its own dynamic. It seems that most of the people coming out for corporal punishment are not parents at all.  I am a single parent and I have also been a volunteer counselor for welfare mothers in Chicago.  I have seen families where the belt was the only thing in their discipline toolbox...a busted tool.  I've also seen totally permissive types. Neither one is appropriate. 

Refraining from corporal punishment does not make a parent a pushover. It is a conscious and in most cases, an educated lifestyle choice.  Isn't it ironic how most people dive into parenting armed with childbirth classes but know very little about child rearing. My own practices are based upon attachment parenting and loving guidence. Kids should know what is expected and what will happen if they don't meet expectations. This is how they learn how to set their own expectations for themselves. This can be done without the initiation of violence against a child. I am rather surprised that that there is even a spanking lobby in this group.  I never realized objectivists could be sooooooo irrational.

"To deal with men by force is as impractical as to deal with nature by persuasion"  

"So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate the use of physical force against others"
 
 "It is only as retaliation that force may be used and only against the man who starts its use. No, I do not share his evil or sink to his concept of morality: I merely grant him his choice, destruction, the only destruction he had the right to choose: his own."



Post 89

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 3:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
If you want the lazy man's method of learning creative parenting techniques, I would suggest watching the ABC reality show Supernanny.  I only saw one episode and while realizing it is edited for T.V., I would have to say she did an amazing job of disciplining three "revolting little snots" without resorting to "smacking & more serious physical chastisement ".   To all you SOLO pro-spanking advocates, there is a better way.  Check it out. 

Gerald


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 90

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 5:43pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Violence is the only kind of chastisement I will not endure.

"My alternative methods never chastise the child" she implies as she inserts another carrot up her ass!!!

Give me a break Mother Teresa!!!

Children are not men!!!!


Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 91

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 - 6:15pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
katdaddy says: "It seems that most of the people coming out for corporal punishment are not parents at all. and later, "I never realized objectivists could be sooooooo irrational."

This is not so katdaddy, I have 6 kids and never fail to beat them regularly. In fact I even beat the 19 year old from time to time, I go over to his house and punch him in the mouth, nothing personal, just for old times sake.


Marcus,

I can tell by the number of exclamation points in your last post that you are reaching the boiling point. : )  Give it up, it looks like this issue is a lost cause. Two threads and 200 post later, and the drivel only gets worse.

George


 


Post 92

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 2:52pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Oh Linz, don't take it personally. It's just that, you know, you got old. And I'd like to play the field in my few remaining years.

Post 93

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 2:52pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

(Edited by Alec Mouhibian on 1/20, 2:54pm)


Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 94

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 3:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
If you were ever the man you pretended to be, you would value my whippings above any others' if I were eighty & in a wheelchair. If you have an ounce of morality left in you, you'll be spankless for the next twenty years.

Post 95

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 4:13pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ha!  Good one. :)

Post 96

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 9:54pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'm not sure I'll understand what you're saying unless you slap me accross the face three times.

Post 97

Thursday, January 20, 2005 - 11:03pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Damn you, Alec. Always demanding the extras.

Post 98

Sunday, January 23, 2005 - 7:04pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Does this mean we get to read an interesting but nonetheless misleading and useless 'To whom it may concern letter' from Linz 'Wheelie Grandma' Perigo in the next Free Rad? I sure hope so.

Pianoman

Sanction: 2, No Sanction: 0
Post 99

Monday, January 24, 2005 - 10:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for the props, Joe.

Obviously, I agree with the legal enforcement position taken by Linz and Joe--and as I wrote previously, someone's gotta enforce these types of laws--we are inviting the government into every corner of our lives.

But here are 2 additional points on this issues that stick in my craw.

As a practical matter: How much time, effort and consistency is required of a parent of the non-spank camp to raise a difficult child?

Assuming we can agree that even in the same family, some children seem born more rambunctious than others, what are you supposed to do as a parent? The elaborate strategies of the non-spank camp make the parent a warden, who must be forever be on watch to make sure punishment is consistently meted out.

Who has time to do this? What adult can match energy with a willful child? No one can. This approach it outrageous, and puts the child in front of the adult, which, to my mind, is an epidemic mistake in middle-class-or-better America. Exactly how much productive capacity must be sacrificed to police the children, teach the children, nurture the children? It is unrealistic for the majority of people who actually have children. Should I or a woman quit our jobs and sacrifice all we value in life in dedication to satisfying Little Johhny's evey whim?

Does the rest of the world (non-middle-class-or-better people from everywhere) only sire little assholes? While there is some evidence for this proposition, the reality is that most kids come out AOK NOT being pampered, spoiled, coddled, and yes, most get a whack now and again.

As far as I have read, no one in the spank camp says spank til unconciousness, or spank as a first resort. Everyone saya spank as a LAST resort. So, if you aren't going to spank, what DO you do with a tough little kid of the likes Joe and I have mentioned? Let's assume that even if you think no such child exists, one does for this exercise. What's the alternative? Therapy? Medication? Institutionalization? In preference to a non-damaging smack on the ass?

As an economic matter: What consequences have been routinely proven to result to a child who is spanked as one of the disciplining tools in a parent's arsenal? I mean, other than anecdotal, vague supposition that it creates little hoodlums? None, I submit. So, if an occasional, non-permanently-damaging spank quickly and efficiently stops bad behavior, and leaves no scientifically demonstrable negative consequences, isn't it at least efficient? And if it is, why not use it, ONLY as necessary to cure bad behavior not correctible by other means?




Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Forward one pageLast Page


User ID Password or create a free account.