About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Forward one pageLast Page


Post 40

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 3:52amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Joe, excellent article. The "Bob" principle rings loud and clear. In a predominantly benevolent, thoughtful, caring, mature culture most would establish habits of non-Bob behavior. In the predominantly cruel, thoughtless, uncaring, immature culture that I see today human relationships are guesswork. Many Objectivist-types take the modern day non-Bob approach which amounts to branding a capital "I" on most everyone's foreheads where the "I" stands for "Immoral." They separate permanently from the "Immorals" and consider them valueless.

Certainly Bob should have canned his girlfriend early on. The non-Bob approach also will work in business. The danger I see is with friendships and family. Our romantic standards and business standards must be more highly refined than the standards for friends and family.


Regarding love, it is not a conscious agora-style exchange of values but I'll allow that it is an exchange of values of a kind. It's a subconscious thing largely. It's physical at first. A glance, says Victor Hugo, and that is all. The love and admiration grows when we are moved by the beloved'a choices in addition to what nature has given (in my case) her. Nature made her beautiful in body. And her choices make her exponentially beautiful in spirit.

Now I've come too close to figuring this out so I'm going to back off. :-)


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 41

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 5:36amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
In love and romance there indeed is a balance sheet. The *currency* may not be money, but there is currency nontheless.

I have found in those (in my life) who deny this, a hidden motive, of demanding altruism on the part of me. "if you loved me you would..." could be the preface to many many conversations and is implicit in all of them with such people. Assertiveness comes with self esteem.

Increasingly a huge part of the equation for me is *admiration*.

John

Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 42

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 5:44amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Excellent article Joe.

I think the measure of love in a relationship (romantic or otherwise) depends on whether you can be happy or not without that person in your life. Does that person enrich your life or not?

It should also be remembered that there is never going to be one person that you get on with 100% of the time and like every facet about them. Your partner may be deficient of the "must haves" as Jennifer puts it. Therefore, you may decide that you need to find better. You may also decide that it is worth trying to solve your problems.

I would say that when there is love for your partner it reflects the values you admire in that person.

Either way, I don't think that relationship compatibility is a simple question. It's obviously for everyone to decide according to their priorities. Figuring out what your "must haves" are in a relationship is not the easiest thing to do. We will sometimes make the wrong decisions.  Hopefully, we can then learn from our mistakes. That is what life and love is all about.


(Edited by Marcus Bachler on 5/21, 5:51am)


Sanction: 7, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 7, No Sanction: 0
Post 43

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 7:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

*Sigh*

It is always easy to be wise in the hindsight, and to carefully balance the spreadsheet. I have to admit that when I loved someone in my younger, much younger and naive days, I held on to the things that dazzled me beyond my wildest dream and was totally blind of anything else. What balance sheet? In that state, even negative characteristic has a ring of charm going with it. I had thought that I alone could accomplish anything and everything. Was it love? Of course it was, however foolish it might be. Looking back today I have no regret for it since I only learned what’s really wrong afterward.

 





Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 44

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 7:56amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Jennifer,

I certainly agree with you about big-ticket items and what you say (in your own words) about prioritizing values in a relationship. If you don't keep your own values straight, then who will? There are oodles of aspirants for that role (including, relationship-wise, more control freaks than anything else out there), but not one of them will be in you shoes during the precious moments of your life that should be lived in happiness, or even at the dying time - and dying frustrated for not having gone for the big brass ring is not My Way (like in the song).

But some of these prioritizing values issues are extremely complex and the priorities are not always so clear cut - even to the person professing them. That makes putting them on a balance sheet not only difficult, I would even say irresponsible to the person himself/herself.

I know that whenever I have tried to make light of something serious to a significant other, I have made light of that also in my own soul. Sometimes the results have been disastrous.

Here is an example from my past. You mentioned jealous rages. I no longer tolerate them myself. Well, one of my exes was a former Playboy Bunny and she was gorgeous. But she was extremely jealous of me (of all things!!! - but there it is...). The jealousy was not the whole story, though - nor was the conceit thing of watching all the men perk up every time we went somewhere (and the women too, as they think that a guy like me must have had a "special something" to have a gal like that - and all kinds of bullshit - but I will not deny that this was one of my payoffs back then). There was a very human, kind and warm side to her that I found extremely attractive, and a little girl kind of fragility that really appealed to the male protectiveness side of me.

I do not feel jealousy in my heart too often and it was almost a rush back then to have such a stunning looking woman be jealous of me. I got off on it more than I should have. That is until she figured out where I was at.

Once it became a competition thing, I was in way over my head. Good Playboy Bunnies know things about how to manipulate the male psyche that other women just don't know. When this one finished with me, I didn't recognize myself anymore - I was a complete nervous wreck, insanely jealous of her every move and thought and on a wild roller coaster of emotional highs and lows that I, as a classical musician in my ivory tower, had never even dreamed about before. I did a lot of stupid things back then.

Ultimately, unlike Bob, I was the one who put a stop to it. My overriding concern was not her and her behavior, or even her value to me - it was me. I could not go on like that and I had no idea why I had lost control of myself. I had to get away from the good, the bad and the ugly, all of it, take a deep breath and start trying to figure out what went wrong - not with our relationship but with everything. Once I decided to separate from her, the execution was pretty objective and even brutal in its finality - but even then, the days afterward were filled with anxiety going-back-and-forth, and once we almost even gave it another whirl. We were both terribly hurt by the whole affair (but also we sure had our moments).

In the light of the current issue we are discussing, this is very complicated. The tendency I see in the Objectivists I have talked to and read is to oversimplify, like with the balance sheet metaphor. I wonder if that is why in Objectivism, I hear more about failed relationships than about successful ones (this comment is not meant personally, it is merely part of the idea I am discussing - anyway from my history, I am certainly not one to talk). It is so easy to make a huge mistake in life from oversimplifying.

For instance, nowadays, I do not permit jealousy to reign in my heart, but I know that I am very much capable of it. I have been there. The path for me is not to repress those feelings (by putting them on a "balance sheet"), but to deal with them and the situations that cause them with a great deal of care and brutal self-honesty. I am an Objectivist who looks into my own soul and tries to see everything, including the ugly, and to deal with it. That even makes the striving for the highest more valuable to my self-esteem. But it is not easy to look inside and say that I can be petty at times and even like it, for example. But there it is and there is a lot more. Only by doing this can I correct myself. I think this kind of thinking needs to be used in relationships, not just one-size-fits-all metaphors and homilies (didn't Ayn Rand call them bromides?).

My parents, unlike me, have a marriage that is 53 years old and it is a wonderful thing to see. A good deal of keeping that together was the persistence and accepting each other that I mentioned, in addition to their priority values. I remember some pretty Homeric fights when I was growing up. But the reward for sticking it out is right in front of me today. It is something I want for myself.

And, to look at Joe's message from the other end, when a conflict arises in a relationship that is so severe that breaking up seems to be the "hard way" but the correct solution, that is instead of taking the "easy way" and putting it off, breaking up just might be the "easy way" - too much so.

I know that to achieve what my parents have is the result of taking a very hard way and sticking to it.

Michael


Edit - Hong, our  posts crossed. Que graçinha! I love your self honesty.

(Edited by Michael Stuart Kelly on 5/21, 8:06am)


Post 45

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 8:18amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hi Michael.

I think we do agree on a lot of this -- it's possible that my definitions may come across in an oversimplified way.  For me the viewpoint is always that of the big picture and the question: Does this enrich my life?  If there is a deficit, the relationship has got to go, and I can get to that decision quite easily because my emotions quickly catch up with my brain.  (This is a result of a lot of mental and emotional "cleaning out.")

The path for me is not to repress those feelings (by putting them on a "balance sheet"), but to deal with them and the situations that cause them with a great deal of care and brutal self-honesty. I am an Objectivist who looks into my own soul and tries to see everything, including the ugly, and to deal with it.
I don't think the balance sheet has anything to do with repression, but quite the opposite -- it is an approach of utter honesty.  For example, with your Playboy Bunny, you had "ledger entries" of "gorgeous" on one side and "manipulative" on the other, and had to decide which had a more positive or negative effect on your life.  Pros and cons, if you will.

It is hardest to be objective when one is deeply in love.  However, if one has done the mental and emotional homework, it is easier not to get caught up in sentiments like "The sex is magnificent!!" while ignoring "She treats me like a puppet."  One has to weigh the issues and see if a pro outweighs a con by a factor of ten.  It took me a long time to get to a comfortable place with such an approach, but it has not failed me yet.  I now know exactly what is negotiable and what is not.

As I said, in the end I think we're talking about much the same thing.


Sanction: 2, No Sanction: 0
Post 46

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 8:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I can honestly say that I've never really weighed the positives and negatives consciously in romantic relationships as I've had only a couple that went past the casual dating stage. Many people in successful relationships don't talk about them a lot because it's often hard to communicate what makes them fun and what makes them work. If there isn't a "personal chemistry" to the relationship, it won't work well. My wife and I have been married for a little over 4 years and it's been terrific. She is generally pro-free market, but highly antagonistic to Objectivism. However, she's been very receptive to Nathaniel Branden's works.

Many people also have the wrong impression that happily married people don't fight. It's the unexpressed and inappropriate expression of anger that kills relationships.

Jim


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 47

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 8:51amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I think with all the talk of serial monogamy, the benefits of breaking up etc., it's worthwhile also to talk about the benefits of a loving, lasting relationship. When I attended my cousin's wedding, my uncle said something that was very profound: One of the great advantages of a lasting marriage is that over time each person remembers the other as they were when they were young and has a repository of shared experiences that can be relived throughout a lifetime.

Jim


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 48

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 9:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Jennifer, you wrote:
It took me a long time to get to a comfortable place with such an approach, but it has not failed me yet.  I now know exactly what is negotiable and what is not.
You have my deepest heartfelt wishes that this perseveres. I mean it. When something like that shatters, the result is a holy mess. I know the hard way (but then, that is me, not you). Oversimplification is the crack where that can split open, so for some unsolicited advice, be VERY CAREFUL with simplifying your negotiables. Some of them can blow up in your face. But yes, in general, we are talking about the same thing.

Escept...

About bunny, it was much more than ledger entries. It was the pure insanity of suspending all rational thought and living on a daily diet of emotional highs and lows where thinking was almost impossible. Exstacy and agony and no middle.

I would even say that things that would normally be entered in the "assets" column went to "liabilities" and vice-versa back then, if there even was a balance sheet. All criteria went out the window. And I went there from where you described in the above quote. I now know that I am capable of that, which is one of the reasons it will never happen again. Knowledge of my weaknesses is my strength.

btw - The manipulation in my case was not sexual. Whoever said that bunnies have to be great in the sack? They have to be good, but sometimes they sell the sizzle better than the sausage... However, they sure know what makes a man tick in the off-ledger accounting of his soul.

Michael

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 49

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 9:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Jim, a present from your uncle:
One of the great advantages of a lasting marriage is that over time each person remembers the other as they were when they were young and has a repository of shared experiences that can be relived throughout a lifetime.
What a nice way to put it. Building that repository has now become my goal (a feline repository btw...).

Michael


Post 50

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 9:05amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I think with all the talk of serial monogamy, the benefits of breaking up etc., it's worthwhile also to talk about the benefits of a loving, lasting relationship.

Good suggestion, James. Then it may also be worthwhile to talk about what it takes to have a loving and lasting relationship with the person you love. But I can see this one can be even more trickier...


Post 51

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 10:27amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I think one of the ways to have a lasting relationship is to find creative ways to keep falling in love with each other. I know with my wife, I haven't begun to explore all of the possibilities. We both enjoy hiking and nature and we've been to about 15 National Parks together. We've been to Hawaii twice, I'm making some  (very)beginning headway learning Mandarin and I spent two and a half weeks visiting her family in Taiwan.

You also have to kind of take turns with your careers. I spent three years helping in a small role getting a new semiconductor plant going in New Mexico, but realized after two years of her unemployment I would have to make a change, so we moved to New York and she's working down in Manhattan as a Sequel programmer/research analyst and I'm crazily working in semiconductor development. 

The things I love about my wife are her curiosity and fearlessness. She didn't know how to swim, but that didn't stop her from snorkeling in seven feet of water in Hawaii with me and I taught her how to swim when we got home. It's all about having quality shared experiences...


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 52

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 10:40amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael:

"One last point. Going into a relationship already planning an exit strategy for "just in case" to me is already taking second best in life. Once I have evaluated and chosen and the chemistry and love are there, I prefer to plunge in as deeply as I can to the limits of madness, and if I get hurt real bad (like I have been), I have made a magnificent failure, not a settling on the easy way."

I say:

Huzzah! Bingo! I agree 100%! Surf the rising crest of passion to its highest. Only then is it worth the possibility of the depth of the undertow!

So, how did that surfing analogy work out? Efffective? Too obscure?

Post 53

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 10:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hong says: "It is always easy to be wise in the hindsight..."

Too true. I'll betcha a nickle that every 'spreadsheeter' has spread their sheets for a delicious temptation that caught their eye, oblivous to the otherwiese obvious shortcomings of the potential mate, and walked around in a daze for weeks, months, or maybe even YEARS before realizing that the banalce sheet was off...it si a fine guide to action, but in matters of love, we are least predisposed to 'using our heads.'
(Edited by Scott DeSalvo
on 5/21, 11:21am)


Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Post 54

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:09amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"So, how did that surfing analogy work out? Efffective? Too obscure?"

It's a good one. Just throw in something about avoiding the board after you fall off. I had a board come down and hit me right on top of the head. Almost drowned. Haven't tried surfing again since.

Seriously, about the subject at hand, I think it's almost impossible to avoid having a relationship with someone when the "chemistry" is just right. At least for me. It's only after the initial stages wear off that I have the ability to think clearly and say "whoa, this can't work". Unfortunately you may already be married at that point. Is there such a thing as a hormonally driven objectivist?


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 55

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:20amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mike,
Is there such a thing as a hormonally driven objectivist?
LOLOLOLOL...

I think that's the only kind there is. Objectivists just work too hard at trying to cover it up, but all you have to do is look, and it's always there...

On the surfing thing (just so Scott knows that I know how clever he actually is, so he can go on living with himself), in Brazil, there is a saying of dying on the beach - meaning that you surf or swim all the way to the beach, but cannot enjoy the dry land because you expired right at the time you arrived.

Wanna give that one a spin on your surfboard, Scott? When I go metaphorical here with romance, the waves dance before my eyes...

//;-)

Michael


Post 56

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:27amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ooh-er. All this talk of balance sheets and financial accounting has made me come over all a-quiver.

Jennifer wrote:
However, if one has done the mental and emotional homework, it is easier not to get caught up in sentiments like "The sex is magnificent!!" while ignoring "She treats me like a puppet." 
Said, dare I say it, as only a woman could say it. :-)

Scott on the other hand writes:
I'll betcha a nickle that every 'spreadsheeter' has spread their cheets for a delicious temptation that caught their eye, oblivous to the otherwiese obvious shortcomings of the potential mate, and walked around in a daze for weeks, months, or maybe even YEARS before realizing that the balance sheet was off
Yep. One sure can do that :-(  It's a kind of voluntary servitude. Fortunately, some of us have just enough sense to snap out of it before they get to Bob's stage.


Post 57

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:35amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I agree with many of the comments here, especially the ones about hindsight.

The question remains: How can we learn from the lessons of others so we can turn hindsight into foresight?  Objectivism seeks to induce both universal and contextual abstract propositions from many concrete observations of reality.  Can we learn some valuable lessons from the long and checkered history of romantic love so that  we can optimize our chances for success?

I really liked the episode from Season Two of Penn and Teller's Bullshit! called "The Business of Love."  It poked hysterical fun at the likes of John Gray, to whom they pointed and said, "Who is this asshole, anyway?"  Cynicism aside, they noted that the "rush" of falling in love involves many of the same endorphins as chocolate consumption.  In a sense, the deeper pre-conscious portions of the brain feed our bodies certain signals that may well clash with our conscious, rational portions.  A person can become addicted to this "rush" in the same way he becomes addicted to chocolate, alcohol, etc.

To corroborate this viewpoint, the Rational Recovery site at http://www.rational.org/ actually states that "The sole cause of your addiction is a voice in your head that tells you to 'Do it!'"  It offers a "Recover Now" link that would behoove any person to browse before he becomes involved in a "punch drunk love" relationship.  Naturally, I share their graphic with you here:

The Human and Beast Brain

A man can feel a physical attraction to many different women yet choose to be with his dear wife simply by choosing to listen to the higher portions of his brain -- his "inner grandmother" rather than his "inner child."  This illustrates the Objectivist concept of volition as the choice about whether to focus and upon what to focus.

These facts should offer us some direction in how we ought to conduct ourselves romantically and sexually.


Post 58

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:39amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I think the measure of love in a relationship (romantic or otherwise) depends on whether you can be happy or not without that person in your life. Does that person enrich your life or not?

Well said, Marcus. One ought to take time on a Sunday afternoon, sit in a comfy wicker chair facing the sea and ask themselves, "Is this person making my life better or worse?"

If we can answer honestly it will solve most problems involving people. Desire for the beloved's body has been known to distort the process in my experience, however.  


Post 59

Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 11:41amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mike,

I think instead of the balance sheet, I try to use mental imagery and try to imagine what everyday life would be like with the person. I once went out on a couple dates with a lady I knew from work who was a real Dagny Taggart type. When I tried to figure out where I would fit in between her 7AM-7PM work schedule, her 2 hour commute home, her horses and a few other things the picture became clear to me. After she took a new job, I tried calling a couple of times and had good conversations, but she never reciprocated. Several months later after no contact, I took a job working for her and enjoyed the friendship and working relationship but kept it platonic.

One other good reality check is to ask yourself what in the reasonable realm of possibility is the worst that could happen at any important stage in the relationship. If it's not that bad then you're probably OK. If it is bad, then are the rewards worth the risk and the costs?

Jim


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Forward one pageLast Page


User ID Password or create a free account.