About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, September 26, 2008 - 6:56amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
After reading the initial entry here, I had to google the term "speculative non-fiction" because my understanding of it was totally different from Ted's.  I did, indeed, find other websites, where the label applies as it does here, to works about aliens, star-trek technology, ESP and other "speculations."  However, my understanding -- perhaps as much as five years old now -- is that it is a nominally true story, garnished with inventiions and literary devices to make the telling come alive for the reader.  Another word for that is "bullshit." 

Creative non-fiction (speculative non-fiction) is an artefact of post-modernism, the is-but-isn't world of academic writing.  (In my own study, tired of being exposed for the failures of their bankrupt philosophy, Marxists now call themselves "critical" sociologists or "critical" criminologists, i.e., critical of capitalism and America.)  When I was a kid, we had these biographies of Abraham Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson.  You saw young Abe chopping wood or young Thomas running downhill, but the author really had no citation for that, nor was one needed.  It was just understood for what it was, embellishment.[1]

Today, creative non-fiction is a new genre -- new to English Literature professors, that is.

"Speculative fiction" goes back to the 1970s, and the works of Kate Wilhelm.  Science fiction has rules -- but rules are so limiting.... So, Kate Wilhelm just wrote stuff without causes or effects.  Being 50% of the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Workshops at Michigan State University, Wilhelm influenced an entire generation of young science fiction writers who were liberated from the necessity of consistency.

Now, we have "speculative non-fiction."  Would that include Plato's Dialogues? Nietzsche's Geneaology of Morals?  Apparently, it includes Ayn Rand's Introduction to the Objectivist Epistemology and Isabel Paterson's God of the Machine.  How was it that these works were even written if the authors did not know what they were doing?  Were they like the M. Jourdain in the Would-be Gentleman (Bourgeois Gentilhomme) who spoke prose for 40 years without realizing it?

Call the works "speculation" if you want, but, do not multiply entities beyond necessity.


[1] For a grown-up example from our own time, see this review of a work of "speculative non-fiction."  When Her Dream of Dreams: The Rise and Triumph of Madam C.J. Walker by Beverly Lowry was published in April (Knopf, $27.50, ISBN 0-679-44642-7), it was billed as "a comprehensive biography ... of America's first black woman millionaire."
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HST/is_5_5/ai_108312744


Post 1

Friday, September 26, 2008 - 9:06amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Here are the works I mentioned, with their themes/theses added:

Isabel Paterson - The God of the Machine
an extended mechanical metaphor of the relation between politics and economics

Stuart Kaufman - The Origins of Order
The spontaneous an inevitable emergence of life in semi-bounded (locally closed but externally driven) systems on the edve of chaos

Ayn Rand - Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology
the nature of concept formation

Robert Graves - The White Goddess
the literary evidence for a submurged pre-Indo European matriarchy

Julian Jaynes - The Origins of Consciousness
self-consciousness in humans arose from a schizophrenic state with the origin of the concepts consciousness or "theory of mind" in a crisis of hydraulic despotism

Monty Roberts - The Man Who Listens to Horses
using signs meaningful to them, a communication of sorts is possible with higher animals

Temple Grandin - Animals in Translation
the consciousness of higher animals is similar to human autistic states

Oliver Sacks - Anthropologist from Mars
individual happiness can be achieved by "abnormal" people not by making them normal, but by understanding their peculiar natures

Nietzsche - The Antichrist
the origins of Judaism, Christianity and Buddhist salvationism in slave psychology

Note the speculative nature of these themes. I invite additions to my list.

Michael, in regards to your "response" above, are you incapable of abstracting from the nine examples I gave to understand my meaning? Why do so often seem to try so hard to misunderstand?

You have been quite helpful in the past. I am sure you can provide an example of a work which introduces a new theory or speculation on the nature of some interesting topic. The next time I want my words to be interpreted based upon a google search of postmodern literati, rather than the obvious literal meaning of the words I've used, I'll say so explicitly.

(Edited by Ted Keer on 9/26, 9:16am)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.