About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Saturday, April 1, 2006 - 10:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
     I think that in such a discussion all would be wise to keep in mind that even the present 'Laws' may have evolved/changed across 'history.' Correct me if I'm wrong, but, inducing back to the proverbial Big Bang in order to 'deduce' therefrom momentary (and long range) developments-to-present (Cosmological 'Reverse Engineering'?), does count on the idea that certain established physical constants have always been...conserved. A useful, but, in the words of Ira, a 'not-necessarily-so' assumption, methinks.

LLAP
J:D


Post 21

Sunday, April 2, 2006 - 5:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Which should raise questions on the myth of the Big bang, not wondering the other direction.......

Post 22

Sunday, April 2, 2006 - 8:32amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Robert,

Don't know if you caught the latest on "Big Bang" or not, but if you didn't here is a link if your interested  to some info I read about a week or so ago.

 When NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe launched from Cape Canaveral in 2001, scientists dreamed of capturing "the ultimate baby picture: an image of the infant universe." Five years later, those dreams have been realized. Data collected by WMAP and made public Thursday offers the strongest evidence yet that the universe started with a Big Bang and inflated in size from a tiny speck to colossal proportions in a fraction of a second. The data also shed new light on the universe's precise age and makeup. That makes the WMAP mission a milestone in humankind's understanding of how it all began.
http://http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_space_thewritestuff/2006/03/new_evidence_fo.html


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.