About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 28Page 8


Post 560

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 1:04pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael,

I'd sure like to see that letter since Durban House made me cough up the same amount last year. If you'd prefer, email it to me at bfs3@charter.net. Thank you.

Sanction: 1, No Sanction: 0
Post 561

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 3:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mr. ben f small,

Wow.

I was just able to find my Post 32 on this thread, where I presented some of my Internet research on Durban House.

I was a bit surprised to learn that the following link,

http://p197.ezboard.com/fabsolutewritefrm11.showMessage?topicID=453.topic

was no longer active, mainly because there was an analysis given there by Victoria Strauss of Durban's contract. Here is my comment in that post (and the link I just mentioned is the second one):

There is a story in 2004 by a disgruntled author, William Barnes, recounted here. The story is pretty abrasive on both sides, so it is difficult to judge.

There is more in 2004 on this here (including response by Mr. Lewis), but it is interesting because the last post on the page by Victoria Strauss analyzes some of the clauses of Durban's publishing contract, and her judgment is that it is author-unfriendly, even when there is no $ 25,000 price tag for the author to pay. But she notes that the $ 25,000 price tag was not an isolated experience for Mr. Barnes, as she had confirmation of this from another author who was asked for $ 25,000 to publish a book, not directly from Durban House, but through his wife's company instead. (If this actually happened in 2004, then Mr. Lewis's claim that Durban's author subsidy practice stopped in 2003 is not accurate.)
The second link is the one that is broken, but I remember the letter from Mr. Lewis being identical to the one in the first link. It is a shame that the contract analysis has disappeared, however, as I stupidly did not paste it into a Word document. Fortunately part of her analysis is given in Michael Prescott's blog - from Michael himself. Here is the link: http://michaelprescott.typepad.com/michael_prescotts_blog/2005/06/vanity_thy_name.html.
A poster named is Mike Farell was answered by Michael P on June 23 with a breakdown of the conditions of Durban's contract based on what he read in Vicoria Strauss's post at the broken link.

The letter where Lewis claims that Durban has not been a subsidy publisher since 2003 is the one to Lee Goldberg at another now broken link (which I mentioned previously) - http://leegoldberg.typepad.com/a_writers_life/2005/03/vanity_presses.html.

For this last, however, I did keep a word document and I will be glad to send you a copy.

Michael



Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Post 562

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 3:13pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
One other clarification on this thread. On going through all those former posts trying to find the one on Durban, I came across one that I wrote (which I don't even think people remember - dayaamm there were a lot of posts!), but just for the record, I want to state something.

I had stated earlier that Barbara no longer posting gave the appearance of cowardice, that it made my job of defending her more difficult and I found it perplexing. After reading everything that has been written about her since then, I would like to take the word "cowardice" out.

It is clear to me that she just doesn't want to be a part of all this. Defending her own honesty at this stage in her life would be the same as stating that it was a valid topic for discussion with her. That would be repugnant to anyone of her stature. So I see no cowardice, not even implied.

Michael


Post 563

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 3:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thank you, and I can confirm that as of May, 2004, the practice had not stopped completely.

Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 28Page 8


User ID Password or create a free account.