Laure Chipman said: There is an extreme example in my past. The high school in my hometown of Pekin, IL had a team called the Chinks... until political correctness kicked in around 1980 I believe. Now, even though the term Chink can be used in a derogatory manner, I don't think it was the case with our school. I mean, the fight song had "we are the Chinks" in it. If you're calling yourself something, is it derogatory? Incoming freshmen got a copy of the Guide for New Chinks & Chinklets.
Personally, I find naming a team the “Chinks”, as highly offensive and racist. Although I do not believe that anyone, for any reason, has a right to impose on the school/university their own standards; I do believe, that naming a team the “Chinks” is very poor judgment and displays a total disregard (and contempt) for Asian people. Imagine a team called “the Niggers” or the “Kikes”: a team named “the Chinks” descends to that level. Oh, by the way, I could care less how many students got a kick out of singing to a racial epithet that does not apply to them.
But, Laure Chipman also said, “Victim mentality is right. I have always thought that we named sports teams after Indian tribes because we think they're cool! I mean, in what way can "the Fighting Illini" be construed as derogatory? “
I cannot agree more. Overwhelmingly, team names are a tribute or form of admiration. But there are, and have been, exceptions; your “Chink” example, being a glaring example of one of them.
The bottom line is that you cannot pigeonhole this entire debate into a simplistic either-or. There is a significant difference between “the braves” and “the redskins” as terms that convey a certain message. With the former, it is an expression of admiration for an aspect of a culture; in the latter it is derisive. Naming a team “the Zulus” is not the same as, “the Niggers”. This should be obvious to any rational person.
Unfortunately, this debate is presented in an either-or manner. Those in favor of pressuring (not mandating) Universities to eliminate “racist” team names are lumped together with the hysterical PC crowd. Those that object to the hyper sensitive and agenda driven howl over any term that is even remotely racial or cultural, are lumped together with the less than courageous people, which prefer to express their racism in a cutsey and cloaked manner.
The NCAA is the governing body of collegiate sports; as such it has every right to impose the rule it recently did. If the schools really object that strongly, they are free to withdraw themselves from NCAA participation. Do I find their ruling reasonable: no. Do I believe that they are catering to the hysterical PC crowd: yes.
But, let us not pretend that all “team mascots and names” are created equal.
Context matters.
Sincerely,
George, “the Spick” Cordero
(Edited by George W. Cordero on 8/07, 12:45pm)
|