About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Friday, June 14, 2013 - 8:39amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
As noted on another Objectivist board,the year 2020 target seems overly ambitious.  I believe that our reach exceeds our grasp in order that we achieve more in life than grabbing low hanging fruit.  So, the target works for me.

It is easy to say that most Objectivists have been following this to some extent since the very beginning.  It is a deeply emotional issue in psychology.  If you question why the government runs a post office and parks, you have to ask why the government needs to explore outer space.  It is easy to claim that NASA is a "momument builder's" idea of a State Science Institute.  And yet... the entire enterprise from Mercury to Apollo through the space shuttle to the ISS was and remains an audacious example of the highest human potential. 

Space colonization : an annotated…
Space colonization: an annotated bibliography
by Michael E. Marotta, Loompanics, 1979.


I have argued that if the government can print its own journals, then it must be able to operate its own presses ... and, utlimately, its own satellites, or whatever else it needs to do its job.  So, putting up satellites and military test pilots could be a proper function.

In any case, we are clearly at the point where we should have been in 1950, when (in fiction), an entrepreneur pointed out that only American industrialists could do the job right.  (See Heinlein's The Man Who Sold the Moon and the film, Destination Moon, which was based loosely on that.)
Destination Moon (1950) Poster
I look to the previous "great age of exploration" (and we have had several).  We all know the 15th through 17th centuries when kings financed largely unprofitable ventures to the New World.  Eventually, they gave that up - especially after the American revolutions - and private citizens colonized the continents.  The multiplicity of social, cultural and legal arrangements must be appreciated.  America (north and south) saw an array of utopian communities.  Mostly, success came from individuals who were not tied to any dogma or group. 

But, also, other times and places saw similar events unfolding.  The Phoenicians were consumate explorers and traders, though not colonizers.  The Greeks colonized the Mediterranean from the Crimea to Spain, from the Alps to Egypt. They explored the English coast (known even then for perhaps 1000 years as a source of tin for bronze).  They explored the Red Sea.  New towns were founded by cities from the common treasuries, but the explorers were on their own. 

This here and now is just more of the same.  But I do not mean "just" in any minimizing sense.  Rather, I point out that this kind of bold achievement is expectable when people perceive within themselves the will to accomplish creative endeavors.


Space Shuttle Enterprise being taken to the Intrepid Museum in New York.

(Edited by Michael E. Marotta on 6/14, 8:42am)


Post 1

Friday, June 14, 2013 - 9:20amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael - I have two books on privatizing the Post Office so I say the same for delivering pieces of paper on Earth and delivery people and payloads into space!

But I generally agree with you. Here's one of my many pieces in praise of the spirit of Apollo: "Apollo 11 On Human Achievement Day."

And on my personal involvement with Apollo 11: "When We Walked On The Moon."

And on "Neil Armstrong: American Hero."

I agree about the pioneering spirit throughout history. Space exploration certainly inspired my generation and I'm always looking for what will inspire young people today. Private Moon bases might well be more distant than 2020 but, as you say, we're at the point we should have been decades ago, with private parties pioneering space ventures a la "Destination Moon."

We have a video of Will Thomas and me discussing private space ventures that will be posted soon.

Cheers!
Ed


Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 9, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Friday, June 14, 2013 - 11:40amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The proper approach is to separate the issue of what is proper for government from what have unarguably been great human achievements. They are different topics - different measurements.

It takes nothing away from the greatness of Apollo 11, that it was done under a government agency even though that kind of activity isn't one where government should be acting.

And, as Ed commented, privatization is the best answer to getting government out of those areas it shouldn't be in. (Real privatization, not the quasi sort that was done with Fannie and Freddie.)

Michael, you said, I have argued that if the government can print its own journals, then it must be able to operate its own presses ... and, utlimately, its own satellites, or whatever else it needs to do its job. So, putting up satellites and military test pilots could be a proper function. Your logic is not solid here. Just because the government should keep records of something, say an expenditure, and they did so with ink pens, does not mean they should owning heavy equipment and mineral rights for mining the ore needed for their smelters and foundries to make the metal parts used in their factories used to make the pens, and trucking companies for transport, farms to grow the food to feed the workers, etc. Your logic, if it were sound, would be a justification for near total communism... or as an explanation of why anarchy is the only escape from a government with moral justification to own almost everything and do almost everything. You seem to be fond of that argument. Don't you see it's flaws?

The answer is in part of your statement, "...whatever it needs to do its job." Its job is to protect individual rights. That might justify some satellites used for military intelligence gathering, but there is no need to own printing presses.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.