| | Mark, your tone has changed and I don't have a sense of you responding with the civility you showed me earlier or the degree of openness and honesty in attending to what my posts said. I'm happy to let anyone reading these decide if that's the case.
My remark about you embarrassing yourself was intended to be sharp, but not rude. Rand was talking about governments defending against governments and there just wasn't any reasonable way to twist that as you did.
My sense is that you have an agenda going with FDR (and that is fine, because he is a first class villain in my book), but you stray into areas I'm not interested in and make claims about Rand's positions that aren't supported.
Personally, I think you would get more traction if you didn't attempt to enlist Rand, by stretching her quotes beyond what they cover, and just blast away at FDR without the Rand/War issues. You loose credibility with me when you take the path you are following. But, like they say, "Up to you."
|
|
