About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, February 28, 2013 - 10:23amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Motivated by Steve Wolfer and Jules Troy, I wrote a summary of my work history and put it on Necessary Facts.  This is here under Objectivism because the opening and closing of that are nods to Atlas Shrugged.  The post was about me qua me, so did not go into "How Ayn Rand Changed My Life" but I could have. 

I was in Young Americans for Freedom and one of my YAF comrades from the school newspaper handed me Anthem as we passed into and out of algebra classes.  I read The Fountainhead next.  I read The Fountainhead again before taking on Atlas.  Somewhere between them, I found the non-fiction at a bookstore.  I think that VOS in paperback was on the front display rack inside the largest bookstore on Cleveland Public Square. I found a card for The Objectivist Newsletter in one of the books. 

Philosophy is about big issues - the universe, universal morality, Art with a Capital A - but really, the deepest message from Ayn Rand (one that is misunderstood by her detractors, and misapplied by many followers) is that each person has a philosophy of some kind and it shows up in how they live their life generally; and specifically in how they work and earn a living. 

Howard Roark tells Peter Keating that to be successful, you must be the kind of person who gets things done, but do get things done, you must love the doing.  At some point, I think it was Kent Lansing or more likeky Roger Enright who laughed, "So, you do need people."  Roark is taken aback, "Of course, I do.  I am not building mausoleums." He has clients in order to build.  He does not build in order to have clients. An economist would point out that both sides of the ledger must balance, but the point was taken.  In the Valley, readers of Atlas Shrugged met a young sculptor who made machine tools.  All work is an act of philosophy.

I can be unmotivated.  And I move on pretty quickly when that happens.  I might be intellectually open to the idea of tax evasion, but anyone who cheats on their taxes - and I do not mean merely using the law to your advantage - anyone who cheats on their taxes would cheat me out of my wages. Although I have worked off the books for libertarians, and bought and sold for silver, I never met a tax cheater who was a libertarian.  Mostly, they are just crooks.  In fact, I once had an employer say, "I don't care who I cheat, there's $15,000 at stake."  I wondered what her upper and lower bounds were...  

I was on another project when the company was sold and we were told to just wait.  My manager suggested that I "surf the web."  I had to ask him what that meant.  By the end of the week, I found another project with a different firm and client. 

In the book version and the movie version of The Fountainhead, Roark's meeting with the Manhattan Bank board is portrayed differently.  In the film, rolling up the blueprints, Roark says, "I'd rather work as a day laborer" and the next scene opens with him drilling in the quarry. Of course, in Atlas Shrugged, the heroes easily become blue collar workers because they started out that way. Last week one of my GOP comrades called being the cook at the restaurant we were at, "a deadend pink collar job."  I thought of Hugh Akston. 

(Edited by Michael E. Marotta on 2/28, 10:34am)


Post 1

Friday, March 1, 2013 - 10:45amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
One of the things I admire about you Michael is the prowess you display as a programming wizard and all things computer related.
I also like many of the quirky historical facts you dig up. The history of valentines day, the herbal contraceptive that was harvested to extinction, as well as the body of knowledge you possess about coins!



Post 2

Friday, March 1, 2013 - 12:25pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks.  Working on relationships is another of those philosophical tasks.  We might be friends before this is over.  As long as we are mutually admiring each other, it was not your radioactivity that impressed me, it was your welding.  I just had an ultrasound the other day.  I figured that she was worth her weight in gold because when I looked at the screen, all I saw was a weather map of North America.

(Edited by Michael E. Marotta on 3/01, 12:29pm)


Post 3

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 - 8:56amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The folks at Code.Org created a video with Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and others, encouraging kids to learn to program computers.  That much is laudable.  Disgracing the video, with an odd anti-capitalist mentality, is a segment by Drew Houston of Dropbox about how much fun it is to be a programmer.  (View from the 3:00 minute to the 4:00 minute mark of this 5:44 announcement.)  Was it the fun of 48 hours in three days to solve a tough problem?  No, it is the fun of skateboarding in the office, playing ping pong, and chatting with your fields.  The segment also touts free food including gourmet cooking three times a day.  But where do these come from, if no one works?  Blank out.  
 
I posted a long reply on my blog with quotes from The Fountainhead. 
 
After the Code.Org video, this article appeared on CNN about the positive side of "goofing off at work."
The theory is that encouraging "play" at work not only boosts morale but also fosters increased creativity and teamwork, leading to better productivity and quality of work. ...
"The emphasis on fun spawns creative energy," explains Lauren Austin. She's creative director at marketing agency MKG in New York, where play is a priority. "Inspiration comes from interacting with one another and the world around us."
I agree 100% that stepping back from a problem and setting it aside allows the opportunity for creativity and insight.  We all have such experiences and we all know many stories.  Friedrich Kekule solved the problem of benzine's structure while dozing off and staring into a fire.  Kari Mullis had a similar insight about PCR (polymerace chain reactions; how we now replicate DNA), while speeding in his sports car up and through the Sangre de Cristo mountains outside Sante Fe.  But when Pasteur said that chance favors the prepared mind, his emphasis was on the mind, not the chance.
 
Large social events seldom have a single cause, but certainly do have identifiable contributing factors.  Not everything going on at one moment causes the events of the next.  But human action is causative.  I believe that the Dot.Com Meltdown was caused in part by the business casual attitude and casual business atmosphere of the times.  The prosperity of the 80s and 90s, a Reagan-Clinton years seemed assured because we never got to the real reason, the root, or radical fact.  Liberty and freedom are requisites to prosperity, but they are not causes of it. 
 
Cut taxes. Remove regulations.  Wealth will follow.  ... but only if the prepared minds can see for themselves the benefits of their creativity.  The creative mind does not work for money or for love, but absent those rewards, much less gets done.  Primitive hunters were great artists. They decorated caves and cliffs, their weapons, and themselves.  Naked in the sun, they wore decorative shells for the pleasure of it. ... but the alphabet was waiting... and waiting...
 
What you can measure you can improve.  The invention of large numbers (beyond 3) led to the creation of writing. And here we are 8,000 years later, living by means that would be inexplicable to our Ice Age ancestors.  The difference is that we learned to work when we did not need to.  We gave up the luxury of hunting in an abundant environment for the opportunity to work long hours every day.  We could measure, count, tally, and store the excess wealth.
 
Will the new theory of goofing off on the job improve the statements of earnings?


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.