About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Forward one pageLast Page


Post 40

Sunday, October 21, 2007 - 11:38amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Robert: "Let me add that I do not gauge my virtue by the actions which I have not taken."

I feel your annoyance.

We all know the saying: "Those who can't do, teach. Those that can't teach, criticize."

Since I have respect for criticism as well as for teaching and doing (the triple threat:)); I really think the saying should be changed to:

For those who can't, rant.

:)

Again, good work on all you are doing.

Michael

Post 41

Sunday, October 21, 2007 - 4:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks, Michael.

What you said goes double for you. You've accomplished a great deal more on behalf of values we hold dear than all your critics combined.

Post 42

Saturday, October 27, 2007 - 3:08pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Teresa,
If what you say is true–and I find it hard to believe that you have examined the issue carefully–nothing I could add would make any difference. For the record, I have been and continue to be very critical of Peikoff and ARI with respect to their propensity toward orthodoxy and the moral denunciation of those who disagree. I consider that policy extremely detrimental to the spread of Objectivism. And I have been outspoken in my defense of both Nathaniel and Barbara Branden here and elsewhere.

Robert,
You attack me for not doing more to further my point of view, and I reply that I take consolation in not doing damage to the legacy of Ayn Rand. My intellectual independence happens to be more important to me than my prominence in the Objectivist movement. Where did I imply that I gauge my virtue by actions that I have not taken? I gauge my virtue by the positive actions I take in support of my own life and happiness, not in my notoreity as a spokesman. That sounds like someone who is basing his self-esteem on his influence over other people–and that is not an especially healthy psychological trait. Incidentally, most of the people, throughout human history, who have exerted influence, have done much more damage than good. That is nothing to feel proud about.


Post 43

Saturday, December 1, 2007 - 2:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Newt Gingrich on In Depth

Gingrich will appear live on In Depth Sunday, December 2, at noon Eastern Time. You can click on the link to submit questions or can call in live. Gingrich, with his acute Christianity and his desire to amend the Constitution in that pursuit is at best a very mixed figure. But he is one of the more astute and principled figures of recent history, as he proved when he resigned his position as Speaker.

Ted Keer

Post 44

Saturday, December 22, 2007 - 7:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Steven Pinker's Stuff of Thought re-airs Sunday at 515AM. Sorry for the late notice. But if you can, you should record this talk, it is quite excellent.

Ted

Post 45

Sunday, April 20, 2008 - 10:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Mark Steyn
Call in Live America Stands Alone

Well, sorry, my DVR didn't bother to list this one in time for the actual showing. But you can follow the link for info on Steyn and his own website. When this repeats (which will be well worth watching) I'll try to post it in a more timely manner.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 46

Monday, April 21, 2008 - 6:17amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Robert Bidinotto:  TAS acts largely as a forum for the dissemination of Ayn Rand's principles -- not as an orthodoxy that insists all members adhere to "official" positions on specific applications of those principles. Individuals speak for themselves, and that includes the staff.

 

The New Individualist has an editorial policy and it is no surprise that news and features articles reflect that.  Whether or not you (plural) all advocate the same response to "Islamofascism" that you all agree that it exists is a shared perspective. 

Furthermore, having hacked my way through three Lee Child books, I have to wonder why I did that.  In each case, I learned a little bit more about "post and patrol" (the fundamentals of my job... somehow never covered in four years of academic study...) but as for the storyline or the characterizations...  I was left wanting something more ...  I just figured that you like stories where bad guys get beaten up and anyone in a US Army uniform is a good guy.  (Did you ever serve in the armed forces?  I did not.)

That said, I am nonetheless greatly impressed with your evenhanded treatment of the Letters pages.  I was really taken aback by the "pro-animal" statements from readers.  You deserve an honorable mention for printing them without responding.  You have done that with other communications that object to, disagree with, or inquire over the editorials, news and features.  Even when you do respond, you stick to the point and tend toward moderation.  All in all, I admire that.

The current issue has an interview with Diana West, author of Death of the Grown-Up.  I had to read it twice because her points were subtle and deep, not at all what I expected.  West's admission that she never read any Ayn Rand was amusing. 

Perhaps most of all, I benefited from Michael Newberry's review of Jeff Larson's work.  After that, I was in the library and made a point of visiting the "N" stacks (Library of Congress; books about Art).  I found one on how to read the pre-Raphaelites.  The pre-Raphaelite painters are fine as far as they go, I suppose -- I like the classical style and mythic themes; the figures are a bit stiff sometimes --- but it was the reading that interested me more.  Long ago, I had an art history class actually part of an honors English sequence and the lecturer explained how to read a painting.  I am always saddened to see people rush through an art museum -- I grew up in Cleveland -- looking at their watches.  Anyway, the point is that Michael Newberry puts into words what your eyes should be doing and what your mind should be making of that.  It is a valuable aspect of Objectivist philosophy that does not get adequate attention.
Robert Bidinotto to Michael Newberry: "You've accomplished a great deal more on behalf of values we hold dear than all your critics combined."
He has critics?



 


Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 8, No Sanction: 0
Post 47

Monday, April 21, 2008 - 6:41amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dennis Hardin wrote: "Robert, This is a rehash of territory we have covered ...   you are ... revealing a gross inability to grasp how abstract ideas (specifically egoism) apply to the real world.  ...  to stop the senseless sacrifice of American soldiers and prevent the massive loss of innocent American lives in the future.
Dennis, unlike TSI for instance, I connect the dots the same way you do on this.  I also understand TAS's  (Bob Bidinotto's)  point of view.  The "just war theory" is not irrational, but it is unreasonable.  Where I have the greater disconnect, however, is not so much with them (though there is that) as it is with your quips, e.g., calling them The Gutless Society.  That is truly unjust.  I also stop short of saying "them" whenever I can.  I can identify Robert with TAS, but I have hard time parsing Christopher within or away from all that is published, just for instance.  So, we can take TNI has a single piece, and, so, too, with the features on the TAS website, and speak to "their" philosophical style or ideological assumptions.   Beyond that, however, even on the website or in the magazine, signed articles are the statements of the author.  Whether and to what extent everyone on the masthead agrees with every word is a moot point.

Stuff publishered here on RoR makes me recoil --- but at the same time just for instance my own views on Katrina ("The Big Apple versus the Big Easy") also made some here cringe.  And, yet, here we all are... you, Bob, me, TSI,...  So, there must be some common element(s).

It is more important to build on the shared values than to alienate the few friends you really could have.


Post 48

Thursday, April 24, 2008 - 7:34pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

John McWhorter In Depth


McWhorter, a linguist, conservative, and pop-culture commentator who happens to be black gained fame with the ebonics controversy of the late 1990's. He writes a column for the New York Sun which is itself alone worth the price of subscription to that daily. Hear him speak at length.


Post 49

Friday, May 2, 2008 - 1:23pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Mona Charen Useful Idiots


Saturday, May 3, at 6:00 PM

Useful Idiots: How Liberals Got It Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First, published by Regnery Publishing.



Post 50

Friday, May 16, 2008 - 10:55amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Michael Meyerson: Liberty's Blueprint

May 17, at 12:00 Noon, Saturday

How Madison and Hamilton Wrote the Federalist Papers, Defined the Constitution, and Made Democracy Safe for the World


Post 51

Friday, May 16, 2008 - 6:34pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Gregg Jackson "Conservative Comebacks to Liberal Lies: Issue by Issue Responses to the Most Common Claims of the Left from A to Z"

Saturday, May 17, at 12:45 PM (15 MIN)



Post 52

Monday, May 19, 2008 - 6:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Prime Minister's Questions

From C-SPAN.ORG

The British P.M. answers his weekly set of questions from the members of the House of Commons. The half hour session starts with enquiries about his upcoming engagements. Following that, additional questions are asked concerning a particular issue, usually on matters of immediate political significance.


By following the title link you can see a video of the latest parliamentary session.

Post 53

Friday, May 23, 2008 - 7:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

David Horowitz, Party of Defeat

A great speaker, a former lefist, and a don't miss episode!

Sunday, May 25, at 6:00 AM

David Horowitz is president of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is the author of many books, including "Radical Son: A Generational Odyssey," "Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left," and "Left Illusions: An Intellectual Odyssey." For more on Mr. Horowitz and his latest book, visit horowitzfreedomcenter.org.




Post 54

Friday, May 23, 2008 - 7:12pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Margaret Thatcher: Downing Street Years

Another great thinker and speaker!

Sunday, May 25, at 1:00 PM, 57 Minutes



(Edited by Ted Keer on 5/23, 7:34pm)


Post 55

Saturday, May 24, 2008 - 11:51amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Ron Paul: The Revolution: A Manifesto

Monday, 7:00 PM 55 min Politics


Post 56

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 9:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Watch Thatcher and Horowitz Now

Thatcher's Downing Street Years and Horowitz's Party of Defeat talks on CSPAN2 can both be seen as "podcats" now by following the links in the posts above.

Horowitz gives an exhaustive account of the Democrats' treasonous actions during the GWB's administration, including how the Times violated the current treason law by publishing the method the US was using to track terrorist funds. His analysis of justifying the war versus selling the war is spot on.

Thatcher is simply incomparable.

Post 57

Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 6:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Andrew McCarthy Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad
interviewed by Hugh Hewitt, host of The Hugh Hewitt Show

Saturday, June 21, at 10:00 PM
Sunday, June 22, at 6:00 PM
Sunday, June 22, at 9:00 PM
Monday, June 23, at 12:00 AM
Sunday, June 29, at 12:00 PM


Post 58

Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 6:21pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Victor Davis Hanson: In Defense of Liberty

Watch Now!

From BookTV: Victor Davis Hanson argues that the U.S. is in danger of losing the ideals of the Enlightenment due to our own lack of willingness to fight for them. The lecture was hosted by the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC.

This hour long lecture is excellent. He cites Civil War and WWI and WWII history, Harry Reid's support for the Iraq War due to Saddam's de facto state of war in violating the armistice, Thucydides and more.

You can view this now at the link above.

Post 59

Sunday, August 3, 2008 - 12:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Ralph Peters gives a first rate performance on In Depth. He is a dynamic speaker with interesting things to say. Don't miss this one!

From BookTV.org:

In Depth: Ralph Peters


Monday, August 4, at 12:00 AM
Saturday, August 9, at 9:00 AM


About the Program

Author and columnist Ralph Peters will be our guest for In Depth on Sunday, August 3rd (LIVE Noon-3pm ET). Mr. Peters, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, writes a regular opinion column for the New York Post. He is the author of 23 books, including 16 works of fiction (eight of which were written under the pen name Owen Parry). His non-fiction books include "Fighting for the Future," "Beyond Terror," "Beyond Baghdad," "Never Quit the Fight," "New Glory," and "Wars of Blood and Faith." Mr. Peters' latest is "Looking for Trouble: Adventures in a Broken World." You can join the discussion by calling in during the program or by e-mailing your questions to booktv@c-span.org.



Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Forward one pageLast Page


User ID Password or create a free account.