Trolls

Ya she claims she did not even notice the moderation and called everyone who posts here "low born scum".

High praise indeed coming from a collectivist comprachico.

Jonathan and others have already called her on numerous bullshit claims.  Now she is an expert on oil painting and photography!

By the way, for anyone interested, Objectivism Online is another great forum that has a lot of activity and some thoughtful posters on it. I understand they recently overhauled the site. I've been posting there and it's been a pleasant experience so far.

One plus is it doesn't have a creepy moderator with a decade-old selfie who follows you around being arrogant and then bans you the moment you talk back.

(Edited by Robert Baratheon on 3/05, 6:18pm)

I enjoy reading everything you post Peter!

She may, I agree with you though I think she is hopelessly stuck and until she has some life experience in the real world she will remain rigidly so.

Perhaps when reality kicks her in the teeth a few times a lightbulb mayyy suddenly light up.  Sometimes when that happens it can be a real eye opener where that person undergoes a big positive change by realizing "damn, Rand was right!!"  I know I did.

(Edited by Jules Troy on 3/06, 12:46am)

I know Dean.  She is the stupidest "smart person" I have never  come across other than some hopelessly rigid religious people who I can to some extent excuse because they have had their brains hard wired not to be rational at all.  She however reminds me of a parrot with a huge volcabulary that is unable or even worse unwilling to absorb a concept presented to her and really think things through.  A huge fragile ego that is easily offended, demands respect but yet is unable to reciprocate respect to those she engages with when they point out flaws in her faulty arguments.  Lol immediately relegated to "lowborn" status.

Queen Eva, a legend in her own mind.

HaHaaHaaa!!

MSK - I know you are reading this. I just read your "explanation" of why you supposedly had to ban me.

You claim to your readers I came into your place and spit in your face. OK, let's make this really, really simple. Produce a single example - even ONE example - of me "spitting in your face" before you came into the thread I created and began gratuitously insulting me by calling me a "preacher." You can't, because you are a rationalizing fraud who changes the facts to suit your narrative. You can't admit what the record shows - that you instigated the entire problem and then skapegoated me to save face to your readership.

(The OL thread is You Win Or You Die, in case any wants to see for themselves who spitted on whom.)

After the unpleasantness, I offered to make peace with you on the single condition that you clarify what a "power game" is so that I could understand what I was prohibited from doing in your place. You refused this very straightforward and reasonable request, then doubled down by claiming this as evidence of my malevolence. How can I agree to follow a "rule" that is so vague as to be meaningless, and why couldn't you simply clarify? Bad faith on your part all the way through. P.S. the offer still stands to bury the hatchet - but you don't want peace and never did.

Go ahead - prove me wrong. Produce your evidence.

(Edited by Robert Baratheon on 3/06, 12:01pm)

Sam - I was asked to take it to dissent.

Robert, 

Putting that post in Dissent is better than anywhere else on the forum, but I agree with Sam.  It is offensive to use this forum as if it were a place to post messages to some other forum.